ArticleMedicine2019
Risk factors of cage subsidence after removal of localized heterotopic ossification by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective multivariable analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for cage subsidence in patients undergoing cervical fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Analysis of adverse sagittal alignment after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy with local kyphosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Short-term and mid-term evaluation of three types of minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery for treatment of L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to identify risk factors of cage subsidence and evaluate surgical outcome by at least 12 months postoperative follow-up.We retrospectively investigated 113 consecutive patients who underwent anterior surgery to relieve spine cord compression resulted from localized heterotopic ossification, from July, 2011 to February, 2016. We divided the patients into 2 groups: cage subsidence <2 mm group and ≥2 mm group. According to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the severity of increased signal intensity (ISI) was classified into grade 0, 1, and 2. Clinical outcome was assessed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system. Logistic regression analysis and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve were utilized for predicting risk factors of cage subsidence, and the recovery rate was evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann-Whitney U test.Logistic regression with cage subsidence as the dependent variable showed independent risks associated with a cervical sagittal malalignment (odds ratio [OR] 11.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.595-35.064, P < .001), thoracic 1 (T1) slope angle (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.259-1.945, P < .001), and excisional thickness (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.163-4.888.0, P = .018). The cut-off values of T1 slope and excisional thickness were 19.65 angle and 3.7 mm, respectively. Patients with high occupying ratio (P = .001) and high ISI grade (P = .012) are more likely to occur lower recovery rate.Patients with high T1 slope angle or preoperative kyphotic deformity should avoid excessive removal of endplate and vertebral body so as to reduce the occurrence of cage subsidence. Poor outcome was closely related to cervical sagittal malalignment and higher ISI grade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.