ArticleHuman brain mapping2020
Linear and nonlinear interrelations show fundamentally distinct network structure in preictal intracranial EEG of epilepsy patients.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The value of linear and non-linear quantitative EEG analysis in paediatric epilepsy surgery: a machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- An individual data-driven virtual resection model based on epileptic network dynamics in children with intractable epilepsy: a magnetoencephalography interictal activity application.Brain communications · 2023Article
- More Than Spikes: On the Added Value of Non-linear Intracranial EEG Analysis for Surgery Planning in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Linear and nonlinear interrelations show fundamentally distinct network structure in preictal intracranial EEG of epilepsy patients.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resection of the seizure generating tissue can be highly beneficial in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, only about half of all patients undergoing surgery get permanently and completely seizure free. Investigating the dependences between intracranial EEG signals adds a multivariate perspective largely unavailable to visual EEG analysis, which is the current clinical practice. We examined linear and nonlinear interrelations between intracranial EEG signals regarding their spatial distribution and network characteristics. The analyzed signals were recorded immediately before clinical seizure onset in epilepsy patients who received a standardized electrode implantation targeting the mesiotemporal structures. The linear interrelation networks were predominantly locally connected and highly reproducible between patients. In contrast, the nonlinear networks had a clearly centralized structure, which was specific for the individual pathology. The nonlinear interrelations were overrepresented in the focal hemisphere and in patients with no or only rare seizures after surgery specifically in the resected tissue. Connections to the outside were predominantly nonlinear. In all patients without worthwhile improvement after resective treatment, tissue producing strong nonlinear interrelations was left untouched by surgery. Our findings indicate that linear and nonlinear interrelations play fundamentally different roles in preictal intracranial EEG. Moreover, they suggest nonlinear signal interrelations to be a marker of epileptogenic tissue and not a characteristic of the mesiotemporal structures. Our results corroborate the network-based nature of epilepsy and suggest the application of network analysis to support the planning of resective epilepsy surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.