Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31625517›Full record

ReviewIET nanobiotechnology2019

Development of nanotechnology for advancement and application in wound healing: a review.

Debalina Bhattacharya, Biva Ghosh, Mainak Mukhopadhyay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IET nanobiotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Nanotechnology for Pain Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Nanocomposites used in the treatment of skin lesions: a scoping review.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens in Burn Wound, Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Approaches (Conventional Antimicrobials and Nanoparticles).The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Debalina BhattacharyaDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata 700019, West Bengal, India. debalina.bhattacharya13@gmail.com.
Biva GhoshDepartment of Biotechnology, JIS University, 81 Nilgunj Road, Kolkata 700109, West Bengal, India.
Mainak MukhopadhyayDepartment of Biotechnology, JIS University, 81 Nilgunj Road, Kolkata 700109, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is a series of different dynamic and complex phenomena. Many studies have been carried out based on the type and severity of wounds. However, to recover wounds faster there are no suitable drugs available, which are highly stable, less expensive as well as has no side effects. Nanomaterials have been proven to be the most promising agent for faster wound healing among all the other wound healing materials. This review briefly discusses the recent developments of wound healing by nanotechnology, their applicability and advantages. Nanomaterials have unique physicochemical, optical, and biological properties. Some of them can be directly applied for wound healing or some of them can be incorporated into scaffolds to create hydrogel matrix or nanocomposites, which promote wound healing through their antimicrobial, as well as selective anti- and pro-inflammatory, and proangiogenic properties. Owing to their high surface area to volume ratio, nanomaterials have not only been used for drug delivery vectors but also can affect wound healing by influencing collagen deposition and realignment and provide approaches for skin tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsBandagesBiocompatible MaterialsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansHydrogelsNanotechnologyRegenerationSkinSkin, ArtificialSkin Physiological PhenomenaTissue ScaffoldsWound Closure TechniquesWound HealingBiocompatible MaterialsDrug CarriersHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID31625517
PMCPMC8676206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.