Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31625267›Full record

ArticleJournal of separation science2019

Signal enhancement in supercritical fluid chromatography-diode-array detection with multiple injection.

Mingzhe Sun, Charlotta Turner, Margareta Sandahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of separation science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingzhe SunDepartment of Chemistry, Centre for Analysis and Synthesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Charlotta TurnerDepartment of Chemistry, Centre for Analysis and Synthesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-1149
Margareta SandahlDepartment of Chemistry, Centre for Analysis and Synthesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8796-2613

Funding

Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning RBP 14-0052Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning SSFSvenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2016-00604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To circumvent the detrimental effects of large-volume injection with fixed-loop injector in modern supercritical fluid chromatography, the feasibility of performing multiple injection was investigated. By accumulating analytes from a certain number of continual small-volume injections, compounds can be concentrated on the column head, and this leads to signal enhancement compared with a single injection. The signal to noise enhancement of different compounds appeared to be associated with their retention on different stationary phases and with type of sample diluent. The diethylamine column gave the best signal to noise enhancement when acetonitrile was used as sample diluent and the 2-picolylamine column showed the best overall performance with water as the sample diluent. The advantage of multiple injection over one-time large-volume injection was proven with sulfanilamide, with both acetonitrile and water as sample diluents. The multiple injection approach exhibited comparable within- and between-day precision of retention time and peak area with those of single injections. The potential of the multiple injection approach was demonstrated in the analysis of sulfanilamide-spiked honey extract and diclofenac-spiked ground water sample. The limitations of this approach were also discussed.

Indexed as

Chromatography, Supercritical FluidHoneyWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater Pollutants, Chemicallarge injection volumemultiple injectionsignal enhancementsupercritical fluid chromatography

Identifiers

PMID31625267
PMCPMC6972688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.