Observational studyHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2019
Prognostic Significance of Heart Rate and Beta-Blocker Use in Sinus Rhythm in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Observational study in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Combination of Beta-Blockers and ACE Inhibitors Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Diseases.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2023Review
- Any heart failure treatments associated with worsening renal function in patients admitted due to acute heart failure?Renal failure · 2021Observational
- Comments About: Prognostic Significance of Heart Rate and Beta-Blocker Use in Sinus Rhythm in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPrognostic significance of heart rate (HR) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains poorly understood.
aimTo evaluate the association of HR and beta-blocker use with all-cause mortality and the optimal HR range in patients with HFpEF and sinus rhythm (SR).
methodsDuring a follow-up of 2.7 years (IQR 1.2-4.1 years), the 330 patients with median age 73 (IQR 64-79) years, 52.1% men, were included. HFpEF was defined as patients with EF ≥ 50%. The outcome measure was all-cause mortality.
resultsIn total, 96 (29.1%) of patients with HFpEF and SR died. A linear tendency between HR and mortality was observed in SR. Compared to the reference strata HR ≤ 60 bpm, HR increment was associated with progressively increased risk in mortality (Chi-square = 13.90, Log rank P = 0.001) by Kaplan-Meier analyses. Univariate Cox regression showed that in SR, compared with that in HR 61-80 bpm, the unadjusted hazard ratios for mortality were 0.41 (95% CI 0.23-0.74, P = 0.003) in HR ≤ 60 bpm, 1.38 (95% CI 0.85-2.24, P = 0.189) in HR > 80 bpm. Multivariate Cox regression showed that compared with that in HR 61-80 bpm, the adjusted hazard ratios for mortality were 0.37 (95% CI 0.19-0.75, P = 0.005) in HR ≤ 60 bpm, 0.96 (95% CI 0.52-1.74, P = 0.899) in HR > 80 bpm. Univariate Cox regression showed that the unadjusted hazard ratios for mortality were 0.52 (95% CI 0.33-0.84, P = 0.003) in patients with beta-blocker as compared patients without beta-blocker. Multivariate Cox regression showed that the adjusted hazard ratios for mortality were 0.48 (95% CI 0.26-0.87, P = 0.016) in patients with beta-blocker as compared patients without beta-blocker.
conclusionsHR is independently associated with increased all-cause mortality in SR and a lower HR (≤ 60 bpm) is favorable for better outcome in HFpEF patients with SR. Beta-blocker use is associated with reduced mortality and a lower HR is associated with reduced mortality in HFpEF patients with SR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31625118What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.