Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31625060›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2020

The influence of state change on object representations in language comprehension.

Xin Kang, Anita Eerland, Gitte H Joergensen, Rolf A Zwaan, Gerry T M Altmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin KangLinguistics and Modern Languages, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. xin.kang@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-1126-5771
Anita EerlandDepartment of Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gitte H JoergensenDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, United States.
Rolf A ZwaanDepartment of Psychology, Education, and Child Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerry T M AltmannDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand language people form mental representations of described situations. Linguistic cues are known to influence these representations. In the present study, participants were asked to verify whether the object presented in a picture was mentioned in the preceding words. Crucially, the picture either showed an intact original state or a modified state of an object. Our results showed that the end state of the target object influenced verification responses. When no linguistic context was provided, participants responded faster to the original state of the object compared to the changed state (Experiment 1). However, when linguistic context was provided, participants responded faster to the modified state when it matched, rather than mismatched, the expected outcome of the described event (Experiment 2 and Experiment 3). Interestingly, as for the original state, the match/mismatch effects were only revealed after reading the past tense (Experiment 2) sentences but not the future-tense sentences (Experiment 3). Our findings highlight the need to take account of the dynamics of event representation in language comprehension that captures the interplay between general semantic knowledge about objects and the episodic knowledge introduced by the sentential context.

Indexed as

PsycholinguisticsAdultComprehensionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, VisualReadingYoung AdultLanguage comprehensionMental representationObject statePicture verificationTense

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.