Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31625011›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2020

A Preliminary Study of Writing Skills in Adolescents with Autism Across Persuasive, Expository, and Narrative Genres.

Johanna R Price, Gary E Martin, Kong Chen, Jennifer R Jones

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analysis of Autistic Adolescents' Essays Using Computer Techniques.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparing narrative writing of autistic and non-autistic College students.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna R PriceDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC, USA. jprice@wcu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6330-3696
Gary E MartinDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, St. John's University, Staten Island, NY, USA.
Kong ChenCoulter Faculty Commons, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC, USA.
Jennifer R JonesDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Writing is often difficult for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), yet relatively little literature exists that profiles specific strengths and needs within this area. This preliminary investigation compares the written language skills of adolescents with ASD without intellectual disability (n = 14) to typically developing (TD) adolescents (n = 12). Writing samples from persuasive, expository, and narrative genres were elicited. Variables of sample length, writing productivity, syntax, lexical diversity, and macrostructure were analyzed. In the persuasive and expository genres, the ASD group scored significantly lower than the TD group on sample length and some aspects of macrostructure. The ASD group scored higher than the TD group on lexical diversity in the persuasive genre. Other comparisons yielded large effect sizes but were not statistically significant.

Indexed as

WritingAdolescentAutism Spectrum DisorderChildChild DevelopmentChild LanguageFemaleHumansLanguageMaleNarrationPersuasive CommunicationAdolescentsAutism spectrum disorderWriting samplesWritten language

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.