ArticleFamilial cancer2020
Long-term positive psychological outcomes in an Australian pancreatic cancer screening program.
Article in Familial cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- CONNECT4 APOE: A randomized trial of telephone versus real-time two-way videoconference for disclosure of APOE genotype results in cognitively unimpaired adults.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Trial
- Progress, challenges, and future directions of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk populations.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Five-year psychological impact and surveillance compliance in the Australian Pancreatic Cancer Screening Program.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in Families With a Germline CDKN2A Pathogenic Variant.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Familial pancreatic cancer: a case study and review of the psychosocial effects of diagnoses on families.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2023Article
- Health-related quality of life and anxiety levels among patients under surveillance for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Observational
- Review
- Pancreatic Cancer: Pathogenesis, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Gastroenterology · 2022Review
- High signal intensity on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images is a useful finding for detecting early-stage pancreatic cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Observational
- Screening for pancreatic cancer-a compelling challenge.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2021Article
- Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound as a one-off pancreatic cancer screening tool for 122 high- and moderate-risk patients.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020Article
- Patient-reported burden of intensified surveillance and surgery in high-risk individuals under pancreatic cancer surveillance.Familial cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Screening for pancreatic cancer (PC) in high-risk groups aimed to detect early cancers is currently done only in the research setting, and data on psychological outcomes of screening in these populations is scarce. To determine the psychological impact of a national Australian pancreatic screening program, a prospective study was conducted using validated psychological measures: impact of events scale (IES), psychological consequences questionnaire (PCQ) and the cancer worry scale. Measures were administered at baseline, 1-month and at 1-year post-enrolment and correlations with abnormal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) results were calculated. Over a 6-year period, 102 participants were recruited to the screening program. Thirty-nine patients (38.2%) had an abnormal endoscopic ultrasound, and two patients (2.0%) were diagnosed with PC and two with other malignancies. Those with a personal history of cancer or a positive BRCA2 mutation demonstrated significantly increased worry about developing other types of cancer at baseline (p < 0.01). Irrespective of EUS result, there was a significant decrease of total IES score at 1 year (Z = - 2.0, p = 0.041). In patients with abnormal EUS results, there was a decrease in the total IES score at 1 year (Z = - 2.5, p = 0.011). In participants deemed to be most distressed at baseline based on their negative PCQ score, there was a significant decrease of the total PCQ (Z = - 3.2, p = 0.001), emotional (Z = - 3.0, p = 0.001), social (Z = 3.0, p = 0.001) and physical (Z = - 2.8, p = 0.002) subscale at 1-year post-intervention. This study provides evidence of the long-term psychological benefits of PC screening in high-risk patients. There was no negative impact of screening in the short-term and the positive benefits appeared at 1-year post-intervention irrespective of screening result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.