Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31625003›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2020

Long-term positive psychological outcomes in an Australian pancreatic cancer screening program.

R S O'Neill, B Meiser, S Emmanuel, D B Williams, A Stoita

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Screening for pancreatic cancer-a compelling challenge.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R S O'NeillDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, 390 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
B MeiserPrince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
S EmmanuelSt Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
D B WilliamsDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, 390 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
A StoitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, 390 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia. alina.stoita@svha.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-2149
UNSW Sydney · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening for pancreatic cancer (PC) in high-risk groups aimed to detect early cancers is currently done only in the research setting, and data on psychological outcomes of screening in these populations is scarce. To determine the psychological impact of a national Australian pancreatic screening program, a prospective study was conducted using validated psychological measures: impact of events scale (IES), psychological consequences questionnaire (PCQ) and the cancer worry scale. Measures were administered at baseline, 1-month and at 1-year post-enrolment and correlations with abnormal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) results were calculated. Over a 6-year period, 102 participants were recruited to the screening program. Thirty-nine patients (38.2%) had an abnormal endoscopic ultrasound, and two patients (2.0%) were diagnosed with PC and two with other malignancies. Those with a personal history of cancer or a positive BRCA2 mutation demonstrated significantly increased worry about developing other types of cancer at baseline (p < 0.01). Irrespective of EUS result, there was a significant decrease of total IES score at 1 year (Z = - 2.0, p = 0.041). In patients with abnormal EUS results, there was a decrease in the total IES score at 1 year (Z = - 2.5, p = 0.011). In participants deemed to be most distressed at baseline based on their negative PCQ score, there was a significant decrease of the total PCQ (Z = - 3.2, p = 0.001), emotional (Z = - 3.0, p = 0.001), social (Z = 3.0, p = 0.001) and physical (Z = - 2.8, p = 0.002) subscale at 1-year post-intervention. This study provides evidence of the long-term psychological benefits of PC screening in high-risk patients. There was no negative impact of screening in the short-term and the positive benefits appeared at 1-year post-intervention irrespective of screening result.

Indexed as

Psychological DistressAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenes, BRCA2HumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsUltrasonographyEndoscopic ultrasoundImpact of events scalePancreatic cancer screeningPsychological consequences questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID31625003
OpenAlexW2980418406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.