Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31625001›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2019

Addition of Bevacizumab to First-Line Palliative Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study.

Laura M Legué, Felice N van Erning, Nienke Bernards, Valery E P P Lemmens, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Geert-Jan Creemers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura M LeguéDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. laura.legue@catharinaziekenhuis.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0305-391X
Felice N van ErningDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Nienke BernardsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Valery E P P LemmensDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Ignace H J T de HinghDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Geert-Jan CreemersDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData about the use and effectiveness of targeted therapy in metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) are scarce.

objectiveThe aim of this population-based study was to obtain insights into the use and effectiveness of targeted therapy in patients with synchronous metastases of SBA. PATIENTS AND

methodsData were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients treated with palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy for synchronous metastatic SBA between 2007 and 2016 were included (n = 187). Differences in treatment and the subsequent effects on overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

resultsIn first-line treatment, 25 patients (13%) received additional targeted therapy, exclusively bevacizumab, and mostly in combination with CAPOX/FOLFOX (n = 24). A primary ileal tumour was predictive for receiving bevacizumab in first-line treatment (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-9.93). Median OS for patients in whom bevacizumab was added to first-line chemotherapy was 9.3 months, compared to 9.1 months with chemotherapy only (p = 0.85). Median OS for patients receiving first-line treatment only was 8.5 months with and 6.4 months without the addition of bevacizumab, respectively (p = 0.54). In multivariable survival analyses, the addition of bevacizumab was no prognostic factor (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.65-1.59).

conclusionsBevacizumab was the only prescribed targeted therapy in first-line treatment. Considering the limited number of patients receiving first-line bevacizumab and the unknown reasons to prescribe additional targeted therapy, the corresponding survival rates of patients treated with and without additional bevacizumab in first-line treatment might suggest a limited clinical effect of bevacizumab in addition to first-line palliative chemotherapy on OS. Future research should focus on identifying the subgroup of patients who might benefit from anti-VEGF therapy in metastatic SBA.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCapecitabineFemaleFluorouracilHumansIndolesIntestinal NeoplasmsIntestine, SmallLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNetherlandsBevacizumabCapecitabinecediranibFluorouracilIndolesLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID31625001
OpenAlexW2981045823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.