Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624923›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2020

Toothpaste factors related to dentine tubule occlusion and dentine protection against erosion and abrasion.

Samira Helena João-Souza, Leticia Oba Sakae, Adrian Lussi, Ana Cecilia Corrêa Aranha, Anderson Hara, Tommy Baumann, Tais Scaramucci, Thiago Saads Carvalho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dental hypersensitivity in individuals with cleft lip and palate: Origin and therapies.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Samira Helena João-SouzaDepartment of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland. samira.joaosouza@gmail.com.
Leticia Oba SakaeDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adrian LussiDepartment of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Ana Cecilia Corrêa AranhaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anderson HaraDepartment of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Tommy BaumannDepartment of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Tais ScaramucciDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thiago Saads CarvalhoDepartment of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHUniversidade de São Paulo · BRIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/23620-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the effect of toothpastes on dentine surface loss and tubule occlusion, and the association of toothpaste-related factors to each of the outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred and sixty human dentine specimens were randomly distributed into 10 groups, according to different toothpastes. The specimens were submitted to artificial saliva (60 min), citric acid (3 min), and brushing abrasion (25 s; totalizing 2 min in toothpaste slurries). This was repeated five times and two outcome variables were analyzed: dentine surface loss (dSL; μm) and tubule occlusion by measurement of the total area of open tubules (Area-OT; μm

resultsToothpastes caused different degrees of dSL and did not differ in Area-OT. All chemical and physical factors, except the presence of Sn

conclusionGreater dSL was associated with lower pH, lower concentration of F CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Depending on their chemical and physical composition, toothpastes will cause different degrees of dentine tubule occlusion and dentine surface loss. This could, in turn, modulate dentine hypersensitivity.

Indexed as

Dentin Desensitizing AgentsTooth AbrasionTooth ErosionToothpastesDentinHumansSaliva, ArtificialToothbrushingDentin Desensitizing AgentsSaliva, ArtificialToothpastesAnti-erosionDental abrasionDental erosionDentinal tubulesDesensitizingToothpaste

Identifiers

PMID31624923
OpenAlexW2980377952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.