Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624857›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2021

Comparison of pedicle screw misplacement following open vs. percutaneous dorsal instrumentation after traumatic spinal fracture.

Michael Kreinest, Jan Rillig, Maike Küffer, Paul A Grützner, Marco Tinelli, Stefan Matschke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael KreinestDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Trauma Centre Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany. michael.kreinest@bgu-ludwigshafen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1246-8714
Jan RilligDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Trauma Centre Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Maike KüfferS2-Statistics Services, Schwedter Str. 225, 10435, Berlin, Germany.
Paul A GrütznerDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Trauma Centre Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Marco TinelliDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Sinsheim Hospital, Alte Waibstadter Straße 2, 74889, Sinsheim, Germany.
Stefan MatschkeATOS Clinic Heidelberg, Bismarckstr. 9-15, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Klinikum Ludwigshafen · DELudwigshafen University of Business and Society · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDorsal stabilization is a frequently used procedure in the treatment of acute traumatic vertebral body fractures. Besides the traditional open surgical procedure, the percutaneous positioning of pedicle screws is now widely used. The aim of the current study is to compare pedicle screw misplacement following open vs. percutaneous dorsal instrumentation after traumatic spinal fracture of the thoracic and lumbar spine and to assess possible risk factors associated with pedicle screw misplacement.

methodsAll patients who suffered a traumatic spinal fracture that were treated with dorsal stabilization in our level I trauma center in the period from 01/2007 to 03/2014 were included in this retrospective therapeutic cohort study. From 01/2007 to 06/2009, an open surgical procedure was used, and from 06/2009 to 03/2014, the percutaneous procedure was used for all types of fractures. Retrospectively, the positioning of every single pedicle screw was evaluated in the post-operative computed tomography scan and classified. Epidemiological data were also documented to compare the two treatment groups.

resultsA total of 491 patients with 681 vertebral body fractures were included. Of 733 pedicle screws placed during the open surgery procedure, 96.0% were within the safe zone. There was no significant difference compared with pedicle screws placed percutaneously (95.3% of 1884 screws). In all other categories, the number of misplaced pedicle screws also showed no differences between the two treatment groups. There is a positive correlation between pedicle screw misplacement and duration of the operation. Most pedicle screws are misplaced at the levels T12, L1 and T7, T8.

conclusionThe current study shows that percutaneous surgery using dorsal stabilization allows the positioning of pedicle screws in an equivalently safe manner compared with an open surgical procedure in the acute care of spinal trauma.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsSpinal FracturesSpinal FusionCohort StudiesHumansLumbar VertebraeRetrospective StudiesThoracic VertebraeAccuracyGertzbeinMisplacementPedicle screwPercutaneousSpine

Identifiers

PMID31624857
OpenAlexW2980559612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.