Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624855›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2019

Carnivore Management Zones and their Impact on Sheep Farming in Norway.

Geir-Harald Strand, Inger Hansen, Auvikki de Boon, Camilla Sandström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Environmental variability across space and time drives the recolonization pattern of a historically persecuted large carnivore.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Geir-Harald StrandDepartment of Survey and Statistics, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, NIBIO, Ås, Norway. ghs@nibio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7516-0282
Inger HansenDepartment of Natural Resources and Rural Development, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, NIBIO, Ås, Norway.
Auvikki de BoonDepartment of Political Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Camilla SandströmDepartment of Political Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7674-6197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the impact of Norway's current zonal carnivore management system for four large carnivore species on sheep farming. Sheep losses increased when the large carnivores were reintroduced, but has declined again after the introduction of the zoning management system. The total number of sheep increased outside, but declined slightly inside the management zones. The total sheep production increased, but sheep farming was still lost as a source of income for many farmers. The use of the grazing resources became more extensive. Losses decreased because sheep were removed from the open outfield pastures and many farmers gave up sheep farming. While wolves expel sheep farming from the outfield grazing areas, small herds can still be kept in fenced enclosures. Bears are in every respect incompatible with sheep farming. Farmers adjust to the seasonal and more predictable behavior of lynx and wolverine, although these species also may cause serious losses when present. The mitigating efforts are costly and lead to reduced animal welfare and lower income for the farmers, although farmers in peri-urban areas increasingly are keeping sheep as an avocation. There is a spillover effect of the zoning strategy in the sense that there is substantial loss of livestock to carnivores outside, but geographically near the management zones. The carnivore management policy used in Norway is a reasonably successful management strategy when the goal is to separate livestock from carnivores and decrease the losses, but the burdens are unequally distributed and farmers inside the management zones are at an economic disadvantage.

Indexed as

CarnivoraWolvesAgricultureAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesNorwaySheepCarnivoresLivestockPasturePredationSheepZoning

Identifiers

PMID31624855
PMCPMC6838042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.