Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624854›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2019

Short-term dialysis catheter versus central venous catheter infections in ICU patients: a post hoc analysis of individual data of 4 multi-centric randomized trials.

Niccolò Buetti, Stéphane Ruckly, Jean-Christophe Lucet, Olivier Mimoz, Bertrand Souweine, Jean-François Timsit

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Focus on infection.Intensive care medicine · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Niccolò BuettiUniversity of Paris, INSERM IAME, U1137, Team DesCID, Paris, France.
Stéphane RucklyUniversity of Paris, INSERM IAME, U1137, Team DesCID, Paris, France.
Jean-Christophe LucetUniversity of Paris, INSERM IAME, U1137, Team DesCID, Paris, France.
Olivier MimozServices des Urgences Adultes and SAMU 86, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, 86021, Poitiers, France.
Bertrand SouweineMedical ICU, Gabriel-Montpied University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jean-François TimsitUniversity of Paris, INSERM IAME, U1137, Team DesCID, Paris, France. jean-francois.timsit@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6063-7383
Inserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FR

Funding

Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Stiftung -Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (CH) Grant number P400PM_183865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLittle is known on catheter-related infections associated with short-term dialysis catheters (DC). Recommendations for infection prevention are mostly derived from those related to central venous catheters (CVC). A comparison of infectious risk of DCs and CVCs would be instrumental for improving infection control prevention strategies. This study aimed to describe differences in infectious risk between DC and CVC.

methodsWe used individual data from 4 multicenter randomized controlled trials in intensive care units (ICUs) that evaluated various prevention strategies regarding colonization, major catheter-related infections (MCRI) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI). We selected only catheters with non-chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated dressings. A marginal Cox model for clustered data was used for the evaluation of the daily hazard rate for catheter-tip colonization, MCRI and CR-BSI.

resultsWe included 3029 patients and 4148 catheters (31,547 catheter-days) which comprised 1872 DCs and 2276 CVCs. After adjustment on confounders, we identified an increased risk in DC compared to CVC for colonization (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.04, p = 0.04) and for MCRI (HR 2.97, 95% CI 1.03-8.51, p = 0.04) in the first 7 days of catheter maintenance. The daily hazard rate for colonization and MCRI was generally higher for DC in the first catheter-days, whereas it was similar between DC and CVC for longer catheterizations.

conclusionsThe daily risk of colonization and MCRI was significantly higher in DC compared to CVC within the first 7 days of catheter maintenance. Targeted prevention strategies for DC should mostly focus on the period following the insertion.

Indexed as

AgedCatheterization, Central VenousCatheter-Related InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingCentral Venous CathetersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRenal DialysisRenal InsufficiencyRisk AssessmentCatheterCentral venous catheterColonizationDialysis catheterICUInfection

Identifiers

PMID31624854
OpenAlexW2980923341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.