Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624780›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2019

Thrombosis and hemostasis health in pregnancy: Registries from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Maha Othman, Amparo Santamaría Ortiz, María Cerdá, Offer Erez, Adrian Minford, Deborah Obeng-Tuudah, Marc Blondon, Ingrid Bistervels, Saskia Middeldorp, Rezan Abdul-Kadir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Maha OthmanBiomedical and Molecular Sciences School of Medicine Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7562-203X
Amparo Santamaría OrtizUniversity Hospital Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7727-880X
María CerdáUniversity Hospital Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain.
Offer ErezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Soroka University Medical Center School of Medicine Ben Gurion University of the Negev Beer-Sheva Israel.
Adrian MinfordDepartment of Paediatrics Bradford Royal Infirmary West Yorkshire UK.
Deborah Obeng-TuudahKatharine Dormandy Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology The Royal Free NHS Foundation hospital London UK.
Marc BlondonDivision of Angiology and Hemostasis Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine Geneva Switzerland.
Ingrid BistervelsDepartment of Vascular Medicine Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Saskia MiddeldorpDepartment of Vascular Medicine Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1006-6420
Rezan Abdul-KadirKatharine Dormandy Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology The Royal Free NHS Foundation hospital London UK.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILBradford Royal Infirmary · GBQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online patient registries are used to collect data on clinical conditions with rare occurrence or unclear diagnostic and management practices. The success of these registries depends on clear definition of goals, correct identification of patient population/inclusion criteria, availability of appropriate setup and maintenance tools, and the quality of dissemination. The Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) for Women's Health Issues in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, one of 20 committees of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) has developed 6 registries for women's bleeding and thrombotic conditions over the past 2 years and are currently in various stages of progress. Here, we provide information about these registries, including rationale, objectives, and methods for data collection. The aim is to enhance worldwide participation and thus promote the success of these registries. We used ISTH REDCap, a mature and secure Web application for building and managing online surveys and databases, and the ISTH advertising platform to maximize participation. Registries (links and project details available on ISTH and Women's SSC Web sites) include: (1) WiTEAM, project on thrombophilia and placenta-mediated obstetric complications; (2) a registry for disseminated intravascular coagulation in pregnancy; (3) severe congenital protein C deficiency-an obstetric study; (4) obstetric and gynecologic outcomes of women with platelet function disorders; (5) thrombolysis and invasive treatments for massive pregnancy-related pulmonary embolism; (6) pregnancy and exposure to direct oral anticoagulants. The ISTH promotes online registries on women's issues to enhance understanding of current practices, identify knowledge gaps, promote research, and ultimately improve patient safety and quality of life.

Indexed as

blood plateletsdisseminated intravascular coagulationpregnancyprotein C deficiencypulmonary embolismregistriesthrombophilia

Identifiers

PMID31624780
PMCPMC6782017
OpenAlexW2965062538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.