Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624540›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Competition and specialization in an African forest carnivore community.

David R Mills, Emmanuel Do Linh San, Hugh Robinson, Sam Isoke, Rob Slotow, Luke Hunter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of Microbial Indicators in Ecological Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

David R MillsSchool of Life Sciences University of Kwazulu-Natal Durban South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-755X
Emmanuel Do Linh SanDepartment of Zoology and Entomology University of Fort Hare Alice South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6513-5665
Hugh RobinsonPanthera New York New York USA.
Sam IsokeWildlife Conservation Society Kampala Uganda.
Rob SlotowSchool of Life Sciences University of Kwazulu-Natal Durban South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9469-1508
Luke HunterSchool of Life Sciences University of Kwazulu-Natal Durban South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-6544
Panthera Corporation · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Fort Hare · ZAWildlife Conservation Society Uganda · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, human activities have led to the impoverishment of species assemblages and the disruption of ecosystem function. Determining whether this poses a threat to future ecosystem stability necessitates a thorough understanding of mechanisms underpinning community assembly and niche selection. Here, we tested for niche segregation within an African small carnivore community in Kibale National Park, Uganda. We used occupancy modeling based on systematic camera trap surveys and fine-scale habitat measures, to identify opposing preferences between closely related species (cats, genets, and mongooses). We modeled diel activity patterns using kernel density functions and calculated the overlap of activity periods between related species. We also used co-occupancy modeling and activity overlap analyses to test whether African golden cats

Indexed as

avoidanceinterferencenicheoccupancysmall carnivoretemporal

Identifiers

PMID31624540
PMCPMC6787825
OpenAlexW2970561247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.