Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624505›Full record

ReviewMobile DNA2019

The Transposon Registry.

Supathep Tansirichaiya, Md Ajijur Rahman, Adam P Roberts

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mobile DNA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
22.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative Analyses Suggest Genome Stability and Plasticity inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolution of XDRAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mobile genetic elements inJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Characterization ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. OXA-48-like carbapenemases inEmerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Supathep Tansirichaiya1Department of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA UK.
Md Ajijur Rahman1Department of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA UK.
Adam P Roberts1Department of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0760-3088
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposable elements in prokaryotes are found in many forms and therefore a robust nomenclature system is needed in order to allow researchers to describe and search for them in publications and databases. Here we provide an update on The Transposon Registry which allocates numbers to any prokaryotic transposable element. Additionally, we present the completion of registry records for all transposons assigned Tn numbers from Tn

Indexed as

Accessory functionAntimicrobial resistanceComposite transposonConjugative transposonHorizontal gene transferIntegrative conjugative transposonPlasmidRegistryTnTransposon

Identifiers

PMID31624505
PMCPMC6785933
OpenAlexW2979365453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.