Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624498›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2019

Bioconversion of coal to methane by microbial communities from soil and from an opencast mine in the Xilingol grassland of northeast China.

Bobo Wang, Yanfen Wang, Xiaoyong Cui, Yiming Zhang, Zhisheng Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biotechnological potentials of surfactants in coal utilization: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bobo Wang1College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049 People's Republic of China.
Yanfen Wang2College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049 People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyong Cui2College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049 People's Republic of China.
Yiming ZhangBeijing Municipal Ecological Environment Bureau, Beijing, 100048 People's Republic of China.
Zhisheng Yu1College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049 People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9428-9121
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNBeijing Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Xilingol grassland ecosystem has abundant superficial coal reserves. Opencast coal mining and burning of coal for electricity have caused a series of environmental challenges. Biogenic generation of methane from coal possesses the potential to improve economic and environmental outcomes of clean coal utilization. However, whether the microbes inhabiting the grassland soil have the functional potential to convert coal into biomethane is still unclear.

resultsMicrobial communities in an opencast coal mine and in grassland soil covering and surrounding this mine and their biomethane production potential were investigated by Hiseq sequencing and anaerobic cultivation. The microbial communities in covering soil showed high similarity to those in the surrounding soil, according to the pairwise weighted UniFrac distances matrix. The majority of bacterial communities in coal and soil samples belonged to the phyla

conclusionThe potential microbial coal degraders and methanogenic archaea in grassland soil were highly diverse. Significant amounts of biomethane were generated from coal by the addition of grassland soil microbial communities. The unique species present in grassland soil may contribute to efficient methanogenic coal bioconversion. This discovery not only contributes to a better understanding of global microbial biodiversity in coal mine environments, but also makes a contribution to our knowledge of the synthetic microbiology with regard to effective methanogenic microbial consortia for coal degradation.

Indexed as

BiomethaneCoalGrassland soilMicrobial communityOpencast coal mine

Identifiers

PMID31624498
PMCPMC6781394
OpenAlexW2979940660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.