Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624482›Full record

ArticleHSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery2019

Validation of Physical Performance Tests in Individuals with Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis.

Saurabh P Mehta, Nathan Morelli, Caleb Prevatte, Derrick White, Ali Oliashirazi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saurabh P Mehta1School of Physical Therapy, Marshall University, SOPT Rm 129, 2874 5th Ave., Huntington, WV 25702 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7667-5416
Nathan Morelli3Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA.
Caleb PrevatteDepartment of Physical Therapy, Roper St. Francis Mount Pleasant Hospital, Mount Pleasant, SC USA.
Derrick WhiteHuntington Physical Therapy, Huntington, WV USA.
Ali Oliashirazi2Deptartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV USA.
Marshall University · USHuntington University · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with advanced osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee experience significant impairments in balance and in essential physical functions such as walking and rising from a chair. There is limited evidence on valid outcome measures to capture these impairments. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to examine the construct validity of three physical performance measures in patients with advanced knee OA: a gait speed (GS) test, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.

methodsWe designed a cross-sectional clinical measurement study in which patients with advanced knee OA completed two self-reported measures: the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS) and a four-part numeric pain rating scale (Q-NPRS). They were also administered the GS test, TUG test, and SPPB. Convergent and divergent construct validity were assessed by examining relationships between the GS test, the SPPB, the TUG test, the KOOS-PS, and the Q-NPRS and calculating Pearson correlation coefficients (

resultsForty-four subjects (mean age, 66.9 ± 8.1 years) participated in the study. The GS test showed low concordance with the SPPB component tests and the TUG test. The relationships between the physical performance measures and the self-reported measures were low. The scores for the GS test, TUG test, and SPPB in our sample were significantly worse when compared with age-matched normative values, indicating impairments in physical performance.

conclusionThese results advance the understanding of the validity of the GS test, TUG test, and SPPB in demonstrating the impairments in physical performance that patients with advanced knee OA experience in walking, balancing, and rising from a chair. Future research should examine the reproducibility and responsiveness of the GS test, TUG test, and SPPB in patients with advanced knee OA, in order to facilitate the integration of these measures into clinical practice.

Indexed as

balanceclinical measurement studygait speedknee osteoarthritisphysical functioning

Identifiers

PMID31624482
PMCPMC6778264
OpenAlexW2964286336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.