Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624303›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Comparative evaluation of affibody- and antibody fragments-based CAIX imaging probes in mice bearing renal cell carcinoma xenografts.

Javad Garousi, Fokko J Huizing, Anzhelika Vorobyeva, Bogdan Mitran, Ken G Andersson, Charles Dahlsson Leitao, Fredrik Y Frejd, John Löfblom, Johan Bussink, Anna Orlova and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Preclinical Characterization of DPI-4452: AJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Molecular Imaging Diagnosis of Renal Cancer UsingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Javad GarousiDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7224-6304
Fokko J HuizingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anzhelika VorobyevaDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4778-3909
Bogdan MitranDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ken G AnderssonDepartment of Protein Science, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Charles Dahlsson LeitaoDepartment of Protein Science, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fredrik Y FrejdDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
John LöfblomDepartment of Protein Science, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9423-0541
Johan BussinkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anna OrlovaDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6120-2683
Sandra HeskampDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Vladimir TolmachevDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. vladimir.tolmachev@igp.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6122-1734
Uppsala University · SEKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SERadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) is a cancer-associated molecular target for several classes of therapeutics. CAIX is overexpressed in a large fraction of renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Radionuclide molecular imaging of CAIX-expression might offer a non-invasive methodology for stratification of patients with disseminated RCC for CAIX-targeting therapeutics. Radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies and their fragments are actively investigated for imaging of CAIX expression. Promising alternatives are small non-immunoglobulin scaffold proteins, such as affibody molecules. A CAIX-targeting affibody ZCAIX:2 was re-designed with the aim to decrease off-target interactions and increase imaging contrast. The new tracer, DOTA-HE

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmCarbonic Anhydrase IXCarcinoma, Renal CellCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin FragmentsIndium RadioisotopesKidney NeoplasmsMiceMolecular ImagingMolecular ProbesRadioactive TracersSingle Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed TomographyAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmCA9 protein, humanCarbonic Anhydrase IXImmunoglobulin FragmentsIndium-111Indium RadioisotopesMolecular ProbesRadioactive Tracers

Identifiers

PMID31624303
PMCPMC6797765
OpenAlexW2981185333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.