ArticleScientific reports2019
Transcriptome profiling of mouse samples using nanopore sequencing of cDNA and RNA molecules.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-read cDNA sequencing reveals novel isoforms and spliceosome-mutant-enriched transcripts in AML and MDS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Nanopore direct RNA sequencing and the epitranscriptome: Advances in mapping native RNA landscapes.iMeta · 2026Review
- Pan-organ poly(A) atlas reveals a post-transcriptional regulatory layer independent of RNA abundance.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Review
- Genomic language model mitigates chimera artifacts in nanopore direct RNA sequencing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- NanoPrePro: a fully equipped, fast, and memory-efficient preprocessor for nanopore transcriptomic sequencing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Detecting foldback artifacts in long-reads.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- TNRSim - a simulator of truncated oxford nanopore direct RNA long reads for isoform analysis.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Long-Read Sequencing Reveals RNA Splicing Complexity in Human Diseases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Detecting Foldback Artifacts in Long-reads.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Polyadenylation landscape of in vivo long-term potentiation in the rat brain.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Cataloging the potential functional diversity of Cacna1e splice variants using long-read sequencing.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Enhancing transcriptome expression quantification through accurate assignment of long RNA sequencing reads with TranSigner.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Morphogenesis, starvation, and light responses in a mushroom-forming fungus revealed by long-read sequencing and extensive expression profiling.Cell genomics · 2025Article
- Long-read genomics reveal extensive nuclear-specific evolution and allele-specific expression in a dikaryotic fungus.Genome research · 2025Article
- A systematic benchmark of Nanopore long-read RNA sequencing for transcript-level analysis in human cell lines.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Toward the use of nanopore RNA sequencing technologies in the clinic: challenges and opportunities.Nucleic acids research · 2025Review
- Host-pathogen protein interaction studies: quality control of cDNA libraries using nanopore sequencing.PloS one · 2025Article
- A species-level identification pipeline for human gut microbiota based on the V3-V4 regions of 16S rRNA.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- NERD-seq: a novel approach of Nanopore direct RNA sequencing that expands representation of non-coding RNAs.Genome biology · 2024Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our vision of DNA transcription and splicing has changed dramatically with the introduction of short-read sequencing. These high-throughput sequencing technologies promised to unravel the complexity of any transcriptome. Generally gene expression levels are well-captured using these technologies, but there are still remaining caveats due to the limited read length and the fact that RNA molecules had to be reverse transcribed before sequencing. Oxford Nanopore Technologies has recently launched a portable sequencer which offers the possibility of sequencing long reads and most importantly RNA molecules. Here we generated a full mouse transcriptome from brain and liver using the Oxford Nanopore device. As a comparison, we sequenced RNA (RNA-Seq) and cDNA (cDNA-Seq) molecules using both long and short reads technologies and tested the TeloPrime preparation kit, dedicated to the enrichment of full-length transcripts. Using spike-in data, we confirmed that expression levels are efficiently captured by cDNA-Seq using short reads. More importantly, Oxford Nanopore RNA-Seq tends to be more efficient, while cDNA-Seq appears to be more biased. We further show that the cDNA library preparation of the Nanopore protocol induces read truncation for transcripts containing internal runs of T's. This bias is marked for runs of at least 15 T's, but is already detectable for runs of at least 9 T's and therefore concerns more than 20% of expressed transcripts in mouse brain and liver. Finally, we outline that bioinformatics challenges remain ahead for quantifying at the transcript level, especially when reads are not full-length. Accurate quantification of repeat-associated genes such as processed pseudogenes also remains difficult, and we show that current mapping protocols which map reads to the genome largely over-estimate their expression, at the expense of their parent gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.