Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624231›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2019

SPOP suppresses pancreatic cancer progression by promoting the degradation of NANOG.

Peng Tan, Yunke Xu, Yichao Du, Lile Wu, Bing Guo, Shiyao Huang, Jinhui Zhu, Bo Li, Fujun Lin, Lei Yao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular insights for the tumor suppressor role of SPOP in prostate cancer.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Kelch-like proteins in the gastrointestinal tumors.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Ubiquitin signaling in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peng TanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Yunke XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Yichao DuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Lile WuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Bing GuoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Shiyao HuangAcademician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Jinhui ZhuDepartment of General Surgery and Laparoscopic Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310009, Hangzhou, China.
Bo LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, Sichuan, China. liboer2002@126.com.
Fujun LinRenal Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200092, Shanghai, China. linfujun@xinhuamed.com.cn.
Lei YaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, Sichuan, China. Yaolei2009@gmail.com.
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speckle-type POZ domain protein (SPOP), an adaptor in the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, recognizes substrates and promotes protein degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. It appears to help regulate progression of several cancers, and we show here that it acts as a tumor suppressor in pancreatic cancer. Our analysis of patient tissues showed decreased SPOP expression, which was associated with poor prognosis. SPOP knockdown in SW1990 (in vitro/vivo) and PANC-1 (in vitro) cells led to significantly greater proliferation, migration, and invasion. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments in SW1990 cells showed that SPOP interacted with the stem-cell marker NANOG, and this interaction has recently been shown to play a critical role in regulating progression of prostate cancer. We showed that, in one patient with pancreatic cancer, the expression of a truncated form of SPOP (p.Q360*) lacking the nuclear localization signal led to nuclear accumulation of NANOG, which promoted growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells. Our results suggest that SPOP suppresses progression of pancreatic cancer by promoting the ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of NANOG. These results identify the SPOP-NANOG interaction as a potential therapeutic target against pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationDisease ProgressionDown-RegulationFemaleGenes, Tumor SuppressorHEK293 CellsHeterograftsHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNanog Homeobox ProteinNANOG protein, humanNuclear ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSPOP protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31624231
PMCPMC6797744
OpenAlexW2980663871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.