Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624126›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Biological embedding of experience: A primer on epigenetics.

Maria J Aristizabal, Ina Anreiter, Thorhildur Halldorsdottir, Candice L Odgers, Thomas W McDade, Anna Goldenberg, Sara Mostafavi, Michael S Kobor, Elisabeth B Binder, Marla B Sokolowski and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. slideimp: efficient imputation of DNA methylation data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. DNA Methylation ofBiological research for nursing · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria J AristizabalDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2, Canada.
Ina AnreiterDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9563-0579
Thorhildur HalldorsdottirCentre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0003-0637-8912
Candice L OdgersProgram in Child and Brain Development, CIFAR, MaRS Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4937-6618
Thomas W McDadeProgram in Child and Brain Development, CIFAR, MaRS Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada.
Anna GoldenbergProgram in Child and Brain Development, CIFAR, MaRS Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada.
Sara MostafaviProgram in Child and Brain Development, CIFAR, MaRS Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada.
Michael S KoborDepartment of Medical Genetics, Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, and BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V52 4H4, Canada.
Elisabeth B BinderProgram in Child and Brain Development, CIFAR, MaRS Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7088-6618
Marla B SokolowskiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2, Canada; marla.sokolowski@utoronto.ca kieran.odonnell@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7462-8007
Kieran J O'DonnellProgram in Child and Brain Development, CIFAR, MaRS Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada; marla.sokolowski@utoronto.ca kieran.odonnell@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3935-1014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological embedding occurs when life experience alters biological processes to affect later life health and well-being. Although extensive correlative data exist supporting the notion that epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation underlie biological embedding, causal data are lacking. We describe specific epigenetic mechanisms and their potential roles in the biological embedding of experience. We also consider the nuanced relationships between the genome, the epigenome, and gene expression. Our ability to connect biological embedding to the epigenetic landscape in its complexity is challenging and complicated by the influence of multiple factors. These include cell type, age, the timing of experience, sex, and DNA sequence. Recent advances in molecular profiling and epigenome editing, combined with the use of comparative animal and human longitudinal studies, should enable this field to transition from correlative to causal analyses.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsDNA MethylationEpigenomicsGene-Environment InteractionHumansbiological embedding of experienceepigenetic mechanismsepigenomegene–environment interplaytranslational research

Identifiers

PMID31624126
PMCPMC7519272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.