Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31624083›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2019

Checkpoint inhibition of origin firing prevents DNA topological stress.

Esther C Morafraile, Christine Hänni, George Allen, Theresa Zeisner, Caroline Clarke, Mark C Johnson, Miguel M Santos, Lauren Carroll, Nicola E Minchell, Jonathan Baxter and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DNA replication timing: Biochemical mechanisms and biological significance.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Rad53 arrests leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis via distinct mechanisms in response to DNA replication stress.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Esther C MorafraileWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom.
Christine HänniWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom.
George AllenWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom.
Theresa ZeisnerWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom.
Caroline ClarkeWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom.
Mark C JohnsonWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom.
Miguel M SantosWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom.
Lauren CarrollWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom.
Nicola E MinchellGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom.
Jonathan BaxterGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom.
Peter BanksInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Dave LydallInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Philip ZegermanWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom.
Wellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute · GBWellcome Trust · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011194/1Cancer Research UK BB/M002314/1Cancer Research UK BB/S001425/1Cancer Research UK C15873/A12700Cancer Research UK C37096/A13001Cancer Research UK C6946/A14492Medical Research Council MR/L001284/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 092096Wellcome Trust 107056/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A universal feature of DNA damage and replication stress in eukaryotes is the activation of a checkpoint-kinase response. In S-phase, the checkpoint inhibits replication initiation, yet the function of this global block to origin firing remains unknown. To establish the physiological roles of this arm of the checkpoint, we analyzed separation of function mutants in the budding yeast

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA, FungalGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, cdcMutationReplication OriginSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsS PhaseStress, PhysiologicalDNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinscatenationcheckpointDNA topologygenome stabilityorigin firingRad53S-phasesupercoilingyeast

Identifiers

PMID31624083
PMCPMC6824463
OpenAlexW2981217628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.