Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31623686›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2019

Hemimethylation of CpG dyads is characteristic of secondary DMRs associated with imprinted loci and correlates with 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at paternally methylated sequences.

Julianna Nechin, Emma Tunstall, Naideline Raymond, Nicole Hamagami, Chris Pathmanabhan, Samantha Forestier, Tamara L Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Epigenetic Reprogramming and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julianna NechinDepartment of Biology, Bryn Mawr College, 101 N. Merion Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA, 19010-2899, USA.
Emma TunstallDepartment of Biology, Bryn Mawr College, 101 N. Merion Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA, 19010-2899, USA.
Naideline RaymondDepartment of Biology, Bryn Mawr College, 101 N. Merion Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA, 19010-2899, USA.
Nicole HamagamiDepartment of Biology, Bryn Mawr College, 101 N. Merion Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA, 19010-2899, USA.
Chris PathmanabhanDepartment of Biology, Bryn Mawr College, 101 N. Merion Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA, 19010-2899, USA.
Samantha ForestierDepartment of Biology, Bryn Mawr College, 101 N. Merion Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA, 19010-2899, USA.
Tamara L DavisDepartment of Biology, Bryn Mawr College, 101 N. Merion Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA, 19010-2899, USA. tdavis@brynmawr.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8688-6548

Funding

National Science Foundation 1514600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn mammals, the regulation of imprinted genes is controlled by differential methylation at imprinting control regions which acquire parent of origin-specific methylation patterns during gametogenesis and retain differences in allelic methylation status throughout fertilization and subsequent somatic cell divisions. In addition, many imprinted genes acquire differential methylation during post-implantation development; these secondary differentially methylated regions appear necessary to maintain the imprinted expression state of individual genes. Despite the requirement for both types of differentially methylated sequence elements to achieve proper expression across imprinting clusters, methylation patterns are more labile at secondary differentially methylated regions. To understand the nature of this variability, we analyzed CpG dyad methylation patterns at both paternally and maternally methylated imprinted loci within multiple imprinting clusters.

resultsWe determined that both paternally and maternally methylated secondary differentially methylated regions associated with imprinted genes display high levels of hemimethylation, 29-49%, in comparison to imprinting control regions which exhibited 8-12% hemimethylation. To explore how hemimethylation could arise, we assessed the differentially methylated regions for the presence of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which could cause methylation to be lost via either passive and/or active demethylation mechanisms. We found enrichment of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at paternally methylated secondary differentially methylated regions, but not at the maternally methylated sites we analyzed in this study.

conclusionsWe found high levels of hemimethylation to be a generalizable characteristic of secondary differentially methylated regions associated with imprinted genes. We propose that 5-hydroxymethylcytosine enrichment may be responsible for the variability in methylation status at paternally methylated secondary differentially methylated regions associated with imprinted genes. We further suggest that the high incidence of hemimethylation at secondary differentially methylated regions must be counteracted by continuous methylation acquisition at these loci.

Indexed as

DNA Methylation5-MethylcytosineAnimalsCalcium-Binding ProteinsCpG IslandsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p57Embryo, MammalianGenetic LociGenomic ImprintingLiverMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRNA, Long NoncodingsnRNP Core Proteins5-hydroxymethylcytosine5-MethylcytosineCalcium-Binding ProteinsCdkn1c protein, mouseCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p57Dlk1 protein, mouseH19 long non-coding RNAMEG3 non-coding RNA, mouseRNA, Long NoncodingsnRNP Core ProteinsCdkn1cDNA methylationEpigeneticsGenomic imprintingH19NdnPeg12Secondary DMRSnrpn

Identifiers

PMID31623686
PMCPMC6796366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.