Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31623680›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019

A novel wearable device to deliver unconstrained, unpredictable slip perturbations during gait.

Corbin M Rasmussen, Nathaniel H Hunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Corbin M RasmussenDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6160 University Drive South, Omaha, NE, 68182, USA. cmrasmussen@unomaha.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7117-097X
Nathaniel H HuntDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6160 University Drive South, Omaha, NE, 68182, USA.

Funding

Visual control of locomotion in people with Parkinsons diseaseP20GM109090 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI MANGALAM, MADHUR · 2014 to 2023
$20.5M
MECHANISMS OF FALL RESISTANCE TO DIVERSE SLIPPING CONDITIONSR15AG063106 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI HUNT, NATHANIEL H · 2019 to 2019
$420k
NIA NIH HHS R15 AG063106NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109090NIH HHS P20GM109090NIH HHS R15AG063106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTask-specific perturbation training is a widely studied means of fall prevention, utilizing techniques that induce slips or slip-like perturbations during gait. Though effective, these methods only simulate narrow ranges within the larger space of possible slipping conditions encountered in daily life. Here we describe and test a novel, wearable apparatus designed to address these limitations and simulate a diverse range of slipping disturbances.

methodsThe device consists of wireless triggering and detachable outsole components that provide adequate friction with the floor when secured to the wearer's foot, but suddenly create a low-friction surface underfoot upon release. "Benchtop" tests were carried out to quantify device triggering characteristics (i.e. cutting temperature, release delay) and the resulting friction reduction. The device was also tested on six healthy young adults (3 female, age 23 ± 2.4 years), who walked with and without the device to observe how gait kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters were influenced, then performed 12 walking trials ending with a slip delivered by the device. Each participant also completed a survey to obtain opinions on device safety, device comfort, slip realism, and slip difficulty. A linear mixed effects analysis was employed to compare subject spatiotemporal parameters with and without the apparatus, as well as correlation coefficients and root mean square errors (RMSE) to assess the impact of the device on lower limb gait kinematics. Slip onset phases, distances, directions, velocities, and recovery step locations were also calculated.

resultsThis device rapidly diminishes available friction from static coefficients of 0.48 to 0.07, albeit after a substantial delay (0.482 ± 0.181 s) between signal reception and outsole release. Strong correlations (R > 0.93) and small RMSE between gait kinematics with and without the device indicate minimal effects on natural gait patterns, however some spatiotemporal parameters were significantly impacted. A diverse range of slip perturbations and recovery steps were successfully elicited by the device.

conclusionsOur results highlight the efficacy and utility of a wearable slipping device to deliver diverse slip conditions. Such an apparatus enables the study of unconstrained slips administered across the gait cycle, as well as during different locomotor behaviors like turning, negotiating slopes, and level changes.

Indexed as

GaitPostural BalanceWearable Electronic DevicesAccidental FallsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFootFrictionHumansMaleRehabilitationYoung AdultBalanceFallsGaitPerturbationsSlipsTask-specific TrainingWearable Technology

Identifiers

PMID31623680
PMCPMC6798496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.