Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31623619›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2019

Feminisation of the health workforce and wage conditions of health professions: an exploratory analysis.

Geordan Shannon, Nicole Minckas, Des Tan, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Neha Batura, Jenevieve Mannell

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Breaking the Glass Ceiling? Gender Dynamics in Turkish Dental Faculty Leadership.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Is workplace violence against health care workers in Mozambique gender related?The International journal of health planning and management · 2023
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Geordan ShannonCentre for Gender and Global Health, Institute for Global Health, University College London, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. geordan.shannon.13@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1691-0311
Nicole MinckasCentre for Gender and Global Health, Institute for Global Health, University College London, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Des TanSTEMA, Institute for Global Health, University College London, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Hassan Haghparast-BidgoliCentre for Global Health Economics, Institute for Global Health, University College London, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Neha BaturaCentre for Global Health Economics, Institute for Global Health, University College London, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Jenevieve MannellCentre for Gender and Global Health, Institute for Global Health, University College London, 3rd floor, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe feminisation of the global health workforce presents a unique challenge for human resource policy and health sector reform which requires an explicit gender focus. Relatively little is known about changes in the gender composition of the health workforce and its impact on drivers of global health workforce dynamics such as wage conditions. In this article, we use a gender analysis to explore if the feminisation of the global health workforce leads to a deterioration of wage conditions in health.

methodsWe performed an exploratory, time series analysis of gender disaggregated WageIndicator data. We explored global gender trends, wage gaps and wage conditions over time in selected health occupations. We analysed a sample of 25 countries over 9 years between 2006 and 2014, containing data from 970,894 individuals, with 79,633 participants working in health occupations (48,282 of which reported wage data). We reported by year, country income level and health occupation grouping.

resultsThe health workforce is feminising, particularly in lower- and upper-middle-income countries. This was associated with a wage gap for women of 26 to 36% less than men, which increased over time. In lower- and upper-middle-income countries, an increasing proportion of women in the health workforce was associated with an increasing gender wage gap and decreasing wage conditions. The gender wage gap was pronounced in both clinical and allied health professions and over lower-middle-, upper-middle- and high-income countries, although the largest gender wage gaps were seen in allied healthcare occupations in lower-middle-income countries.

conclusionThese results, if a true reflection of the global health workforce, have significant implications for health policy and planning and highlight tensions between current, purely economic, framing of health workforce dynamics and the need for more extensive gender analysis. They also highlight the value of a more nuanced approach to health workforce planning that is gender sensitive, specific to countries' levels of development, and considers specific health occupations.

Indexed as

WomenFemaleHealth OccupationsHealth WorkforceHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisProfessional RoleSalaries and Fringe BenefitsFeminist economicsGenderHealth workforceInequalitiesWage conditionsWage gap

Identifiers

PMID31623619
PMCPMC6796343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.