Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31623605›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2019

Detection of large rearrangements in a hereditary pan-cancer panel using next-generation sequencing.

Debora Mancini-DiNardo, Thaddeus Judkins, John Kidd, Ryan Bernhisel, Courtney Daniels, Krystal Brown, Kirsten Meek, Jonathan Craft, Jayson Holladay, Brian Morris and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Debora Mancini-DiNardoMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. dmancini@myriad.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6313-9080
Thaddeus JudkinsMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
John KiddMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Ryan BernhiselMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Courtney DanielsMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Krystal BrownMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Kirsten MeekMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Jonathan CraftMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Jayson HolladayMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Brian MorrisMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Benjamin B RoaMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Myriad Genetics · USMyriad (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare providers increasingly use information about pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes, including sequence variants and large rearrangements (LRs), in medical management decisions. While sequence variant detection is typically robust, LRs can be difficult to detect and characterize and may be underreported as a cause for hereditary cancer risk. This report describes the outcomes of hereditary cancer genetic testing using a comprehensive strategy that employs next-generation sequencing (NGS) for LR detection, coupled with LR confirmation using repeat hybrid capture NGS, microarray comparative genomic hybridization (microarray-CGH), and/or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).

methodsSequencing and LR analysis were conducted in a consecutive series of 376,159 individuals who received clinical testing with a hereditary pan-cancer gene panel from September 2013 through May 2017. NGS dosage analysis was used to evaluate potential deletions or duplications, with controls in place to exclude pseudogene reads. Samples positive for a putative LR based on NGS were confirmed using a comprehensive approach that included targeted microarray-CGH and/or MLPA analysis, with further examination as needed to ascertain the nature of the LR.

resultsA total of 3461 LRs were identified and classified as a deleterious mutation (DM), suspected deleterious mutation (SDM) or variant of uncertain significance. Pathogenic LRs (DM/SDM) accounted for the majority of LRs (67.7%), the largest proportion of which were deletions (86.1%), followed by duplications (11.3%), insertions (1.8%), triplications (0.5%), and inversions (0.3%). Several cases presented illustrate that the laboratory approach employed here can ensure consistent identification and accurate characterization of LRs. In the absence of this comprehensive testing strategy, 9% of LRs identified in this testing population might have been missed, potentially leading to inappropriate medical management in as many as 210 individuals referred for hereditary cancer testing.

conclusionsThese data show that copy number analysis using NGS coupled with confirmatory testing reliably detects and characterizes LRs. Further, LRs comprise a substantial proportion (7.2%) of pathogenic variants identified by the test. A robust and accurate LR identification strategy is an essential component of a high-quality genetic testing program, enabling clinicians to optimize patient medical management decisions.

Indexed as

Gene RearrangementCase-Control StudiesComparative Genomic HybridizationDNA Copy Number VariationsGene DuplicationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutagenesis, InsertionalNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, DNASequence DeletionConfirmatory testingDeletionDuplicationHereditary pan-cancer panel testingLarge rearrangementsMicroarray-CGHMLPANext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31623605
PMCPMC6798444
OpenAlexW2981033449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.