Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31623553›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Characterizing potential repelling volatiles for "push-pull" strategy against stem borer: a case study in Chilo auricilius.

Xin Yi, Song Shi, Peidan Wang, Yaoyao Chen, Qiqi Lu, Tianyi Wang, Xiaofan Zhou, Guohua Zhong

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin YiKey Laboratory of Crop Integrated Pest Management in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1639-6324
Song ShiKey Laboratory of Crop Integrated Pest Management in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Peidan WangKey Laboratory of Crop Integrated Pest Management in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yaoyao ChenKey Laboratory of Crop Integrated Pest Management in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiqi LuKey Laboratory of Crop Integrated Pest Management in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Tianyi WangCollege of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaofan ZhouGuangdong Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, Integrative Microbiology Research Centre, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. xiaofan_zhou@scau.edu.cn.
Guohua ZhongKey Laboratory of Crop Integrated Pest Management in South China, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. guohuazhong@scau.edu.cn.
South China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31701812Special expert on pest control of modern agricultural industry technology system on economic grain and oil crop industry of Guangdong Province 2016LM1127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMassive techniques have been evaluated for developing different pest control methods to minimize fertilizer and pesticide inputs. As "push-pull" strategy utilizes generally non-toxic chemicals to manipulate behaviors of insects, such strategy is considered to be environmentally friendly. "Push-pull" strategy has been extraordinarily effective in controlling stem borers, and the identification of new "pushing" or "pull" components against stem borers could be significantly helpful.

resultsIn this study, the results of field trapping assay and behavioral assay showed the larvae of C.auricilius, one kind of stem borers, could be deterred by rice plant under tilling stage, its main host crop. The profiles of volatiles were compared between rice plants under two different developmental stages, and α-pinene was identified as a key differential component. The repelling activity of α-pinene against C.auricilius was confirmed by Y-tube olfactometer. For illuminating the olfactory recognition mechanism, transcriptome analysis was carried out, and 13 chemosensory proteins (CSPs) were identified in larvae and 19 CSPs were identified in adult of C.auriciliu, which was reported for the first time in this insect. Among these identified CSPs, 4 CSPs were significantly regulated by α-pinene treatment, and CSP8 showed good binding affinity with α-pinene in vitro.

conclusionsOverall, C.auricilius could be repelled by rice plant at tilling stage, and our results highlighted α-pinene as a key component in inducing repelling activity at this specific stage and confirmed the roles of some candidate chemosensory elements in this chemo-sensing process. The results in this study could provide valuable information for chemosensory mechanism of C.auricilius and for identification of "push" agent against rice stem borers.

Indexed as

AnimalsBicyclic MonoterpenesChemotaxisGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationInsect ProteinsInsect RepellentsLarvaMothsOryzaPest Control, BiologicalPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsProtein BindingVolatile Organic Compoundsalpha-pineneBicyclic MonoterpenesInsect ProteinsInsect RepellentsPlant ProteinsVolatile Organic CompoundsHost plantsOlfactory“Push-pull” strategyα-pinene

Identifiers

PMID31623553
PMCPMC6796385
OpenAlexW2981006982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.