Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31623309›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Structural and Functional Characterization of Three Novel Fungal Amylases with Enhanced Stability and pH Tolerance.

Christian Roth, Olga V Moroz, Johan P Turkenburg, Elena Blagova, Jitka Waterman, Antonio Ariza, Li Ming, Sun Tianqi, Carsten Andersen, Gideon J Davies and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structural and Functional Characterization ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes: Structure, Activity, and Reaction Products.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Christian RothYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. Christian.Roth@mpikg.mpg.de.
Olga V MorozYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. olga.moroz@york.ac.uk.
Johan P TurkenburgYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. Johan.turkenburg@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6992-6838
Elena BlagovaYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. lena.blagova@york.ac.uk.
Jitka WatermanYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. jitka.waterman@diamond.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2870-4638
Antonio ArizaYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. antonio.ariza@path.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4364-823X
Li MingNovozymes (China) Investment Co. Ltd., 14 Xinli Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, China. MLIX@novozymes.com.
Sun TianqiNovozymes (China) Investment Co. Ltd., 14 Xinli Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, China. TQSU@novozymes.com.
Carsten AndersenNovozymes (Denmark), Krogshojvej 36, DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark. CarA@novozymes.com.
Gideon J DaviesYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. gideon.davies@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7343-776X
Keith S WilsonYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. keith.wilson@york.ac.uk.
University of York · GBDiamond Light Source · GBMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DENovozymes (Denmark) · DKUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amylases are probably the best studied glycoside hydrolases and have a huge biotechnological value for industrial processes on starch. Multiple amylases from fungi and microbes are currently in use. Whereas bacterial amylases are well suited for many industrial processes due to their high stability, fungal amylases are recognized as safe and are preferred in the food industry, although they lack the pH tolerance and stability of their bacterial counterparts. Here, we describe three amylases, two of which have a broad pH spectrum extending to pH 8 and higher stability well suited for a broad set of industrial applications. These enzymes have the characteristic GH13 α-amylase fold with a central (β/α)

Indexed as

alpha-AmylasesAmylasesBinding SitesCatalytic DomainEnzyme ActivationEnzyme StabilityFungiGlucoseGlycosylationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationProtein BindingStructure-Activity Relationshipalpha-AmylasesAmylasesGlucosebiotechnologystarch degradationstructureα-amylase

Identifiers

PMID31623309
PMCPMC6801514
OpenAlexW2978240869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.