ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019
New Computerized Method in Measuring the Sagittal Bowing of Femur from Plain Radiograph-A Validation Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age- and Gender-Related Femoral Bowing Analysis in the Korean Population and Features for Clinical Applications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Advantages of customization of osseointegrated implants in transfemoral amputees: a comparative analysis of surgical planning.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Interest in curves: when the radius of curvature matters in femur fractures. A CT based morphometric study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Article
- Proximal external femoral torsion increases lateral femoral shaft bowing: a study based on 3D CT reconstruction models.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Determination of intramedullary nail based on centerline adaptive registration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Lateral Bowing of Femur Associated With Older Age, Shorter Stature, and Lower Bone Mineral Density.Cureus · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMismatch of intramedullary nails with the bowing of femur is a frequent clinical finding. Previous studies showed inconsistent results.
methodsWe present an algorithm of region growing territory method to get the radii of the anterior bowing of femur. We also tested it on ten radiographs. Plain radiographs of the lateral view of femur from five men and five women taken between January and August 2014 in Taipei Hospital were chosen randomly. The curvature of femur outline and medullary canal were measured for three times each. Radii of curvature of whole femur, proximal, middle and distal parts were calculated and analyzed.
resultsThe coefficient of variation of the 240 measurements ranged from 0.007 to 0.295 and averaged 0.088. The average radii of curvature of the whole, proximal, middle, and distal femur were 1318 mm, 752 mm, 1379 mm, and 599 mm, respectively. At the distal part of the femur, the radius of curvature of the femur outline (452 mm) was smaller than the medullary canal (746 mm) (p < 0.05). Women's femur was straighter than men's when we compared the whole length (1435 mm vs. 1201 mm, p < 0.05). The radii we calculated were smaller than the current intramedullary nails.
conclusionThe results showed that the inter-observer and intra-observer differences are acceptable, support the impression that different bowing conditions existed for Asians as compared to Caucasians, and also indicate the mismatch of current instruments to the curvature of femur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.