Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31623277›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2019

In Vitro Methods for Evaluating Drug Release of Vaginal Ring Formulations-A Critical Review.

Katharina Tietz, Sandra Klein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Drug and therapeutic intravaginal delivery targeting diseases in the female reproductive tract: A mathematical modeling perspective.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mucoadhesive Chitosan Delivery System withJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katharina TietzCenter of Drug Absorption and Transport, Institute of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Department of Pharmacy, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 3, University of Greifswald, Greifswald 17489, Germany.
Sandra KleinCenter of Drug Absorption and Transport, Institute of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Department of Pharmacy, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 3, University of Greifswald, Greifswald 17489, Germany. Sandra.Klein@uni-greifswald.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vagina is a promising site for both local and systemic drug delivery and represents an interesting administration route for compounds with poor oral bioavailability. Whereas most of the currently marketed dosage forms were designed as immediate release formulations, intravaginal rings (IVRs) offer the possibility of a controlled vaginal drug delivery over several weeks or months. For a long time, the development of IVRs was limited to steroid-releasing formulations. Recently, IVRs have witnessed a surge of new interest as promising delivery systems for microbicides. Therefore, various novel IVR designs have been introduced. To ensure that only safe and effective IVRs will be administered to patients, it is important to properly distinguish between IVRs with desired and undesired release performance. In vitro methods for evaluating drug release of IVRs that present with sufficient predictive capacity for in vivo drug release, and discriminatory power with regard to IVRs quality, are an essential tool for this purpose. The objective of the present review article is to present the current status of in vitro drug release testing of IVRs and to critically discuss current compendial and non-official in vitro drug release methods with regard to their discriminatory power and in vivo predictivity.

Indexed as

dissolution methoddrug releaseintravaginal ring

Identifiers

PMID31623277
PMCPMC6836189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.