Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31623111›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Utility of Big Data in Predicting Short-Term Blood Glucose Levels in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Through Machine Learning Techniques.

Ignacio Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Ioannis Chatzigiannakis, José-Víctor Rodríguez, Marianna Maranghi, Michele Gentili, Miguel-Ángel Zamora-Izquierdo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. End-to-end design of wearable sensors.Nature reviews. Materials · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ignacio Rodríguez-RodríguezFacultad de Informática, Departamento de Ingeniería de la Información y las Comunicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain. ignacio.rodriguez1@um.es.ORCID 0000-0002-0118-3406
Ioannis ChatzigiannakisDipartimento di Ingegneria Informatica Automatica e Gestionale 'Antonio Ruberti', Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy. ichatz@diag.uniroma1.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8955-9270
José-Víctor RodríguezDepartamento de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena; 30202 Cartagena, Spain. jvictor.rodriguez@upct.es.ORCID 0000-0002-3298-6439
Marianna MaranghiDipartimento di Ingegneria Informatica Automatica e Gestionale 'Antonio Ruberti', Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy. marianna.maranghi@uniroma1.it.
Michele GentiliDipartimento di Ingegneria Informatica Automatica e Gestionale 'Antonio Ruberti', Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy. gentili@diag.uniroma1.it.
Miguel-Ángel Zamora-IzquierdoFacultad de Informática, Departamento de Ingeniería de la Información y las Comunicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain. mzamora@um.es.ORCID 0000-0002-0130-2364

Funding

CHIST-ERA (ref. PCIN-2016-010) CHIST-ERA (ref. PCIN-2016-010)H2020-ENTROPY-649849 EU Project H2020-ENTROPY-649849 EU ProjectMINECO grant BES-2015-071956 MINECO grant BES-2015-071956PERSEIDES (ref. TIN2017-86885-R) PERSEIDES (ref. TIN2017-86885-R)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning techniques combined with wearable electronics can deliver accurate short-term blood glucose level prediction models. These models can learn personalized glucose-insulin dynamics based on the sensor data collected by monitoring several aspects of the physiological condition and daily activity of an individual. Until now, the prevalent approach for developing data-driven prediction models was to collect as much data as possible to help physicians and patients optimally adjust therapy. The objective of this work was to investigate the minimum data variety, volume, and velocity required to create accurate person-centric short-term prediction models. We developed a series of these models using different machine learning time series forecasting techniques suitable for execution within a wearable processor. We conducted an extensive passive patient monitoring study in real-world conditions to build an appropriate data set. The study involved a subset of type 1 diabetic subjects wearing a flash glucose monitoring system. We comparatively and quantitatively evaluated the performance of the developed data-driven prediction models and the corresponding machine learning techniques. Our results indicate that very accurate short-term prediction can be achieved by only monitoring interstitial glucose data over a very short time period and using a low sampling frequency. The models developed can predict glucose levels within a 15-min horizon with an average error as low as 15.43 mg/dL using only 24 historic values collected within a period of sex hours, and by increasing the sampling frequency to include 72 values, the average error is reduced to 10.15 mg/dL. Our prediction models are suitable for execution within a wearable device, requiring the minimum hardware requirements while at simultaneously achieving very high prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

Big DataMachine LearningAdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBlood Glucosecontinuous glucose monitoringexperimental evaluationmachine learningshort-term predictionunivariate time serieswearable devices

Identifiers

PMID31623111
PMCPMC6833040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.