Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31623101›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Agriculture Green Total Factor Productivity in China, 1998-2016: Based on More Sophisticated Calculations of Carbon Emissions.

Xiaocang Xu, Xiuquan Huang, Jun Huang, Xin Gao, Linhong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Effect of Farmland Transfer on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Rural China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. How Does Agricultural Mechanization Service Affect Agricultural Green Transformation in China?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Does Cleaner Household Energy Promote Agricultural Green Production? Evidence from China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Spatial Distribution and Convergence of Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Does Digital Inclusive Finance Effectively Promote Agricultural Green Development?-A Case Study of China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Can the Adjustment of China's Grain Purchase and Storage Policy Improve Its Green Productivity?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaocang XuResearch Center for Economy of Upper Reaches of the Yangtse River/School of Economics, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China. cangxiaoxu@ctbu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-6784-9717
Xiuquan HuangResearch Center for Economy of Upper Reaches of the Yangtse River/School of Economics, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China. h656122637@163.com.
Jun HuangBackground Operation Center of Credit Card, China Minsheng Bank (Chengdu), Chengdu 610100, China. lingyunchuangxin@163.com.
Xin GaoBusiness School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China. gxtz1987@hhu.edu.cn.
Linhong ChenSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China. 2017325010005@stu.scu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental costs should be taken into account when measuring the achievements of China's agricultural development, since the long-term extensive development of agriculture has caused huge environmental pollution. This study took agricultural carbon emissions as an undesired output to estimate the agricultural development efficiency in 31 provinces of China from 1998 to 2016, based on the green total factor productivity, as assessed by the slacks-based measure directional distance function and constructing the global Malmquist-Luenberger index. We measured agricultural carbon emissions in terms of five aspects: agricultural materials, rice planting, soil, livestock and poultry farming, and straw burning, and then compared the green total factor productivity index and the total factor productivity index. The study came to the following conclusions: (1) the green technology efficiency change was smaller than the technology efficiency change at first, but the gap between them is narrowing with time, such that the former is now larger than the latter; (2) the green technology efficiency was in a declining state and the green technology progress was increasing, promoting the green total factor productivity growth, from 1998 to 2016; and (3) China's agricultural green total factor productivity increased by 4.2% annually in the east, 3.4% annually in the central region, and 2.5% annually in the west.

Indexed as

EfficiencyAgricultureAir PollutantsCarbonChinaEnvironmental PollutionSoilSoil PollutantsAir PollutantsCarbonSoilSoil Pollutantsagricultural carbon emissionscarbon sourcesgreen total factor productivityspatial correlationspatio-temporal differentiationtime evolution

Identifiers

PMID31623101
PMCPMC6843840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.