ArticleJournal of anatomy2020
Human biological variation in sesamoid bone prevalence: the curious case of the fabella.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Easy to gain but hard to lose: the evolution of the knee sesamoid bones in Primates-a systematic review and phylogenetic meta-analysis.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Accessory heads of the biceps brachii muscle: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of anatomy · 2022Pooled it
- Cumulative effects of lifelong systemic excess growth hormone on postcranial skeletal morphology in adult mice.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Prevalence and morphometry of the fabella in cadaveric and radiological studies: Is there a link to knee osteoarthritis?PloS one · 2026Article
- All-arthroscopic resection of fabella syndrome following total knee arthroplasty: a case report and literature review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Review
- Article
- Isolated lateral-sided knee pain in total knee arthroplasty. A review.Orthopedic reviews · 2024Article
- Open Excision of a Painful Fabella.Arthroscopy techniques · 2022Article
- The prevalence and parameters of fabella and its association with medial meniscal tear in China: a retrospective study of 1011 knees.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- The prevalence of fabella and its relationship with the lateral posterior condylar offset and lateral posterior tibial slope values.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2022Article
- Sensitivity of musculoskeletal models to variation in muscle architecture parameters.Evolutionary human sciences · 2022Article
- Radiological study of fabella in Omani subjects at a tertiary care center.Anatomy & cell biology · 2021Article
- Treatment of Fabella syndrome with arthroscopic fabellectomy: a case series and literature review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Review
- Fabella and patella variants: radiographic prevalence, distribution and clinical relevance in a population of black african descent.Anatomy & cell biology · 2021Article
- The Ethnic and Geographical Distribution of Fabella: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 34,733 Knees.Cureus · 2021Article
- Article
- The prevalence of fabella and its association with the osteoarthritic severity of the knee in Korea.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Article
- Radiological Study on Sesamoid Bones of the Foot among Omani Subjects.Oman medical journal · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The fabella is a sesamoid bone located in the gastrocnemius behind the lateral femoral condyle. In humans, fabellae are 3.5 times more common today than they were 100 years ago, with prevalence rates varying between and within populations. In particular, fabellae have been assumed to be more common in Asians than non-Asians, equally common in men and women, potentially more common in older individuals, and bilateral cases (one per knee) appear to be more common than unilateral ones. The roles of genetic and environmental factors in this phenotypic variation have been hypothesized, but not rigorously investigated. Given its clinical and evolutionary significance (i.e. being associated with several knee ailments, causing medical issues on its own, interfering with medical devices, and being less common in humans than in other mammals), it is important comprehensively to understand prevalence rate variation, and the roles of genetics and environmental factors in that variation. To address these questions, we performed a meta-analysis on data from studies published from 1875 to 2018 to investigate possible variation in sexual dimorphic (n = 22 studies, 7911 knees), ontogenetic (n = 10 studies, 4391 knees), and global (n = 65 studies, 21 626 knees) fabella prevalence rates. In addition, we investigated what proportion of cases are bilateral (n = 37 studies, 900 individuals), and among unilateral cases (n = 20 studies, 204 individuals), if fabellae are more common in the left or right knee. Our results show that, today, fabellae are 2.47-2.60% more common in men than women, and prevalence rates increase ontogenetically in old age (i.e. 70 years old), implying that fabellae can ossify early (i.e. 12 years old) or late in life. Approximately 72.94% of cases are bilateral, and among unilateral ones, fabellae are equally common in right and left knees. There is marked regional variation in fabella prevalence rates, with rates being highest in Asia, followed by Oceania, South America, Europe, Middle East, and North America, and lowest in Africa. Worldwide, an average of 36.80% of knees has ossified fabellae detectable by dissection. These results imply that, while the ability to form a fabella may be genetically controlled, the mechanisms that trigger fabella ossification may be environmentally controlled. What these environmental factors are, can only be speculated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.