Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31622789›Full record

ReviewDifferentiation; research in biological diversity

Reproductive tract biology: Of mice and men.

Gerald R Cunha, Adriane Sinclair, Will A Ricke, Stanley J Robboy, Mei Cao, Laurence S Baskin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Differentiation; research in biological diversity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Building Disease Models for Endometriosis: iPSCs as Game-Changers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Restoring chloride efflux in cystic fibrosis with TMEM16a antisense oligonucleotides.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Hypotonic, gel-forming delivery system for vaginal drug administration.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gerald R CunhaDepartment of Urology, University of California, 400 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA; George M. O'Brien Center of Research Excellence, Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 93705, USA; Department of Pathology, Duke University, Davison Building, Box 3712, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. Electronic address: Gerald.Cunha@ucsf.edu.
Adriane SinclairDepartment of Urology, University of California, 400 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Will A RickeGeorge M. O'Brien Center of Research Excellence, Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 93705, USA.
Stanley J RobboyDepartment of Pathology, Duke University, Davison Building, Box 3712, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Mei CaoDepartment of Urology, University of California, 400 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Laurence S BaskinDepartment of Urology, University of California, 400 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USDuke University · US

Funding

Role of Beta-Catenin in Urinary DysfunctionU54DK104310 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MACOSKA, JILL A., MARKER, PAUL C · 2014 to 2023
$12.8M
UCSF KURe Career Development ProgramK12DK083021 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASKIN, LAURENCE, CARROLL, PETER R · 2008 to 2017
$5.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK083021NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK104310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of male and female reproductive tract development requires expertise in two separate disciplines, developmental biology and endocrinology. For ease of experimentation and economy, the mouse has been used extensively as a model for human development and pathogenesis, and for the most part similarities in developmental processes and hormone action provide ample justification for the relevance of mouse models for human reproductive tract development. Indeed, there are many examples describing the phenotype of human genetic disorders that have a reasonably comparable phenotype in mice, attesting to the congruence between mouse and human development. However, anatomic, developmental and endocrinologic differences exist between mice and humans that (1) must be appreciated and (2) considered with caution when extrapolating information between all animal models and humans. It is critical that the investigator be aware of both the similarities and differences in organogenesis and hormone action within male and female reproductive tracts so as to focus on those features of mouse models with clear relevance to human development/pathology. This review, written by a team with extensive expertise in the anatomy, developmental biology and endocrinology of both mouse and human urogenital tracts, focusses upon the significant human/mouse differences, and when appropriate voices a cautionary note regarding extrapolation of mouse models for understanding development of human male and female reproductive tracts.

Indexed as

AnimalsEpitheliumFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenitalia, FemaleHumansMiceMullerian DuctsOrganogenesisUterusAdenosisAlpha-fetoproteinBenign prostatic hyperplasiaClitorisHypospadiasMullerian ductPenisPrepuceProstateUterusVagina

Identifiers

PMID31622789
PMCPMC7339118
OpenAlexW2971842119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.