ArticleFEBS open bio2020
Fecal microbiota transplantation results in bacterial strain displacement in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for viral diseases: A systematic review of clinical trials.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for induction of remission in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Pooled it
- Fecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Fecal microbiota transplantation promotes reduction of antimicrobial resistance by strain replacement.Science translational medicine · 2023Trial
- Integrating multi-omics data to reveal the host-microbiota interactome in inflammatory bowel disease.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Effect of inulin supplementation in maternal fecal microbiota transplantation on the early growth of chicks.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Fecal microbiota transplantation: application scenarios, efficacy prediction, and factors impacting donor-recipient interplay.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Refractory Crohn's Disease: Perspectives, Unmet Needs and Innovations.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Fecal microbiota transplantation in the metabolic diseases: Current status and perspectives.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Hot topics on fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Autologous fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Evolving Technologies in Gastrointestinal Microbiome Era and Their Potential Clinical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Screening and Selection to Choose the Optimal Donor.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Evaluation of Six Weekly Oral Fecal Microbiota Transplants in People with HIV.Pathogens & immunity · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which is thought to have the potential to correct dysbiosis of gut microbiota, has been used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for almost a decade. Here, we report an interventional prospective cohort study performed to elucidate the extent of and processes underlying microbiota engraftment in IBD patients after FMT treatment. The cohort included two categories of patients: (a) patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≥ 7, n = 11) and (b) patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) (Montreal classification S2 and S3, n = 4). All patients were treated with a single FMT (via mid-gut, from healthy donors), and follow-up visits were performed at baseline, 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month after FMT (missing time points included). At each follow-up time point, fecal samples and clinical metadata were collected. For comparative analysis, 10 fecal samples from 10 healthy donors were included to represent the diversity level of normal gut microbiota. Additionally, the metagenomic data of 25 fecal samples from five individuals with metabolic syndrome who underwent autologous FMT treatment were downloaded from a previous published paper to represent fluctuations in microbiota induced during FMT. All fecal samples underwent shotgun metagenomic sequencing. We found that 3 days after FMT, 11 out of 15 recipients were in remission (three out of four UC recipients; 8 out of 11 CD recipients). Generally, bacterial colonization was observed to be lower in CD recipients than in UC recipients at both species and strain levels. Furthermore, across species, different strains displayed disease-specific displacement advantages under two-disease status. Finally, most post-FMT species (> 80%) could be properly predicted (area under the curve > 85%) using a random forest classification model, with the gut microbiota composition and clinical parameters of pre-FMT recipients acting as factors that contribute to prediction accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.