ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2019
Extraction of chemical-protein interactions from the literature using neural networks and narrow instance representation.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prompt Tuning in Biomedical Relation Extraction.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The scientific literature contains large amounts of information on genes, proteins, chemicals and their interactions. Extraction and integration of this information in curated knowledge bases help researchers support their experimental results, leading to new hypotheses and discoveries. This is especially relevant for precision medicine, which aims to understand the individual variability across patient groups in order to select the most appropriate treatments. Methods for improved retrieval and automatic relation extraction from biomedical literature are therefore required for collecting structured information from the growing number of published works. In this paper, we follow a deep learning approach for extracting mentions of chemical-protein interactions from biomedical articles, based on various enhancements over our participation in the BioCreative VI CHEMPROT task. A significant aspect of our best method is the use of a simple deep learning model together with a very narrow representation of the relation instances, using only up to 10 words from the shortest dependency path and the respective dependency edges. Bidirectional long short-term memory recurrent networks or convolutional neural networks are used to build the deep learning models. We report the results of several experiments and show that our best model is competitive with more complex sentence representations or network structures, achieving an F1-score of 0.6306 on the test set. The source code of our work, along with detailed statistics, is publicly available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.