Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31622400›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Enhancing genomic selection by fitting large-effect SNPs as fixed effects and a genotype-by-environment effect using a maize BC1F3:4 population.

Dongdong Li, Zhenxiang Xu, Riliang Gu, Pingxi Wang, Demar Lyle, Jialiang Xu, Hongwei Zhang, Guogying Wang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessment of genomic prediction capabilities of transcriptome data in a barley multi-parent RIL population.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Multiple Small-Effect Alleles ofFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dongdong LiNational Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Zhenxiang XuCenter for Seed Science and Technology, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Riliang GuCenter for Seed Science and Technology, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Pingxi WangCenter for Seed Science and Technology, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Demar LyleCenter for Seed Science and Technology, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China.
Jialiang XuNational Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
Hongwei ZhangNational Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-5737-6151
Guogying WangNational Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The popularity of genomic selection (GS) has increased owing to its prospects in commercial breeding. It is necessary to enhance GS to increase its efficiency. In this study, a maize BC1F3:4 population, consisting of 481 families, was evaluated for days to anthesis in four environments, and genotyped with DNA chips including 55,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This population was used to investigate whether GS could be enhanced by borrowing information from the genetic basis and genotype-by-environment (G × E) interaction. The results showed that: 1) fitting the top four large-effect SNPs as fixed effects could increase prediction accuracy, including three minor-effect SNPs explaining less than 10% phenotypic variance; 2) the increase of prediction accuracy when fitting large-effect SNPs as fixed effects was related to the decrease of genetic variance; 3) generally, the GS model fitting large-effect SNPs as fixed effects and G × E component enhanced GS. Therefore, we propose fitting large-effect markers as fixed effects and G × E effect for crop breeding projects in order to obtain accurately predicted phenotypic data and conduct efficient selection of desired plants.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideGenome, PlantModels, GeneticOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhenotypePlant BreedingSelection, GeneticZea mays

Identifiers

PMID31622400
PMCPMC6797203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.