Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31622398›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Health workers' perception of malaria rapid diagnostic test and factors influencing compliance with test results in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.

Izuchukwu Frank Obi, Kabiru Sabitu, Abdulhakeem Olorukooba, Ayo Stephen Adebowale, Rabi Usman, Ugochukwu Nwokoro, Olufemi Ajumobi, Suleiman Idris, Lawrence Nwankwo, IkeOluwapo O Ajayi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Izuchukwu Frank ObiNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-1370-7238
Kabiru SabituDepartment of Community Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Abdulhakeem OlorukoobaDepartment of Community Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Ayo Stephen AdebowaleDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Rabi UsmanNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
Ugochukwu NwokoroNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
Olufemi AjumobiMalaria Consortium, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-1205
Suleiman IdrisDepartment of Community Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Lawrence NwankwoMalaria Elimination Program, Ministry of Health, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.
IkeOluwapo O AjayiNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
Ahmadu Bello University · NGAfrican Field Epidemiology Network · NGUniversity of Ibadan · NGFederal Ministry of Health · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe standard practice in treating uncomplicated malaria is to prescribe artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for only patients with positive test results. However, health workers (HWs) sometimes prescribe ACTs for patients with negative malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) results. Available evidence on HWs perception of mRDT and their level of compliance with test results in Nigeria lacks adequate stratification by state and context. We assessed HWs perception of mRDT and factors influencing ACTs prescription to patients with negative mRDT results in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 303 HWs who treat suspected malaria patients in 40 randomly selected public and private health facilities in Ebonyi state. Health workers' perception of mRDT was assessed with 18 equally weighted five-point likert scale questions with maximum obtainable total score of 90. Scores ≥72 were graded as good and less, as poor perception. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression model at 5% significance level.

resultsMean age of respondents was 34.6±9.4 years, 229 (75.6%) were females, 180 (59.4%) community health workers and 67 (22.1%) medical doctors. Overall, 114 (37.6%) respondents across healthcare facility strata had poor perception of mRDT. Respondents who prescribed ACTs to patients with negative mRDT results within six months preceding the survey were 154 (50.8%) [PHCs: 50 (42.4%), General hospitals: 18 (47.4%), tertiary facility: 51 (79.7%) and missionary hospitals: 35 (42.2%)]. Poor HWs' perception of mRDT promoted prescription of ACT to patients with negative mRDT results (AOR = 5.6, 95% C.I = 3.2-9.9). The likelihood of prescribing ACTs to patients with negative mRDT results was higher among HWs in public health facilities (AOR = 2.8, 95% C.I = 1.4-5.5) than those in the private.

conclusionsThe poor perception of mRDT and especially common prescribing of ACTs to patients with negative mRDT results among HWs in Ebonyi state calls for context specific interventions to improve their perception and compliance with mRDT test results.

Indexed as

PerceptionAdultAntimalarialsArtemisininsCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDrug PrescriptionsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansMalariaMaleNigeriaReagent Kits, DiagnosticAntimalarialsartemisininArtemisininsReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID31622398
PMCPMC6797183
OpenAlexW2980827265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.