Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31622044›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2019

Adherence and acceptability of community-based distribution of micronutrient powders in Southern Mali.

Natalie Roschnik, Hawa Diarra, Yahia Dicko, Seybou Diarra, Isobel Stanley, Helen Moestue, Judy McClean, Hans Verhoef, Sian E Clarke

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 7 countries.

Natalie RoschnikProgramme Quality and Policy, Save the Children UK, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1642-6546
Hawa DiarraSponsorship programmes, Save the Children International, Bamako, Mali.
Yahia DickoSponsorship programmes, Save the Children International, Bamako, Mali.
Seybou DiarraSponsorship programmes, Save the Children International, Bamako, Mali.
Isobel StanleyDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Helen MoestueDepartment of Education and Child Protection, Save the Children USA, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0002-0610-7656
Judy McCleanFaculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Hans VerhoefMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9346-9689
Sian E ClarkeDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3829-9584
Save the Children · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSave the Children · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home fortification with micronutrient powders (MNP) has been shown to reduce anaemia, with high overall acceptability and adherence, but there is limited evidence from West Africa. Around 80% of children younger than 5 years are anaemic in Mali, and new interventions are needed. This paper reports on the adherence and acceptability of a community-led MNP intervention targeting children aged 6-59 months in Southern Mali. The MNP were delivered by a multidisciplinary group of community volunteers using community-based preschools, cooking demonstrations, and traditional communication networks to promote MNP, nutrition, hygiene, and child stimulation. The MNP were delivered alongside early childhood development interventions and seasonal malaria chemoprevention. Adherence and acceptability were evaluated through two cross-sectional surveys in 2014 and 2016 and a qualitative evaluation in 2015. Over 80% of parents reported ever having given MNP to their child, with 65% having given MNP for four or more days in the last week. Likely contributors to uptake include: perceived positive changes in the children following MNP use, the selection of a food vehicle that was already commonly given to children (morning porridge or bouillie) and the community driven, decentralized and integrated delivery approach. These findings support recommendations from recent reviews of MNP implementation to use community-based delivery approaches and behaviour change components.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareHumansInfantMaliMicronutrientsPatient CompliancePowdersRural PopulationMicronutrientsPowderscluster randomised controlled trialcommunity-basedcomplementary feedinginfant and child nutritionmalariaMalimicronutrientspreschool children

Identifiers

PMID31622044
PMCPMC6856685
OpenAlexW2980582044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.