ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2019
Ethiopian mothers' experiences with micronutrient powders: Perspectives from continuing and noncontinuing users.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review.Public health nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Lessons learned from implementing the pilot Micronutrient Powder Initiative in four districts in Ghana.BMC nutrition · 2020Article
- Micronutrient powder programs: New findings and future directions for implementation science.Maternal & child nutrition · 2019Review
- Ethiopian mothers' experiences with micronutrient powders: Perspectives from continuing and noncontinuing users.Maternal & child nutrition · 2019Article
- Designing an ethnographic interview for evaluation of micronutrient powder trial: Challenges and opportunities for implementation science.Maternal & child nutrition · 2019Review
- Bottlenecks and predictors of coverage and adherence outcomes for a micronutrient powder program in Ethiopia.Maternal & child nutrition · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As part of a formative evaluation of a micronutrient powder (MNP) trial in Ethiopia that was organized according to a programme impact pathway model, we conducted in-depth focused ethnographic interviews with caregivers of children between 6 and 23 months who had accepted to try "Desta," a locally branded MNP. After stratification into two subgroups by child age, respondents were randomly selected from lists of caregivers who had received MNP from government health workers between 1 and 3 months prior to the interview date. Thirty women who were either currently giving Desta to their child ("continuing users," n = 14) or had stopped feeding Desta ("noncontinuing users," n = 16) were purposefully recruited from both urban and rural areas in the two different regions where the trial was conducted. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and translated, and coded for both emerging and prespecified themes. On the basis of identifiable components in the caregiver adherence process, this paper focuses exclusively on factors that facilitated and inhibited "appropriate use" and "continued use." For "appropriate use," defined as the caregiver preparing and child consuming MNP as directed, we identified four common themes in caregiver narratives. With respect to "continued use," the caregiver providing and child consuming the minimum number of MNP sachets over a recommended time period, our interviews spontaneously elicited five themes. We also examined caregivers' perceptions related to problems in obtaining refills. Attention to caregivers' perspectives reflected in their narratives offers opportunities to improve MNP utilization in Ethiopia, with potential application in other social and cultural settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.