Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31622041›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2019

Predictors of micronutrient powder sachet coverage and recent intake among children 12-23 months in Eastern Uganda.

Nicole D Ford, Laird J Ruth, Sarah Ngalombi, Abdelrahman Lubowa, Siti Halati, Martin Ahimbisibwe, Carine Mapango, Ralph D Whitehead, Maria Elena Jefferds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicole D FordNutrition Branch, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, United States Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-5094
Laird J RuthNutrition Branch, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, United States Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sarah NgalombiNutrition Division, Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Abdelrahman LubowaSchool of Food Technology, Nutrition and Bioengineering, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Siti HalatiNutrition Section, United Nations World Food Programme, Kampala, Uganda.
Martin AhimbisibweNutrition Section, United Nations World Food Programme, Kampala, Uganda.
Carine MapangoNutrition Branch, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, United States Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ralph D WhiteheadNutrition Branch, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, United States Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Maria Elena JefferdsNutrition Branch, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, United States Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-4502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated predictors of micronutrient powder (MNP) sachet coverage and recent intake using data from a cross-sectional survey representative of children aged 12-23 months in Amuria district, Uganda. In June/July 2016, caregivers were interviewed 12 months after implementation of an integrated MNP and infant and young child feeding pilot (N = 761). Logistic regression described predictors of (a) high-MNP sachet coverage (received at least 60 sachets/6 months) and (b) recent intake (consumed MNP during the 2 weeks preceding the survey) among children who had ever received MNP and had complete data (N = 683). Fifty-nine percent (95% Confidence Interval [CI] [53.8, 64.2]) of children had high-MNP sachet coverage, and 65.4% (95% CI [61.0, 69.9]) had recent intake. MNP ration cards (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 2.67, 95% CI [1.15, 6.23]), organoleptic changes to foods cooked with soda ash (AOR 1.52, 95% CI [1.08, 2.14]), having heard of anaemia (AOR 1.59, 95% CI [1.11, 2.26]), knowledge of correct MNP preparation (AOR 1.89, 95% CI [1.11, 3.19]), and current breastfeeding (AOR 2.04, 95% CI [1.36, 3.08]) were positively associated with MNP coverage whereas older child age (18-23 vs. 12-17 months) was inversely associated with coverage (AOR 0.32, 95% CI [0.23, 0.50]). MNP ration cards (AOR 2.86, 95% CI [1.34, 6.09]), having heard an MNP radio jingle (AOR 1.40, 95% CI [1.01, 1.94]), knowledge of correct MNP preparation (AOR 1.88, 95% CI [1.04, 3.39]), and the child not disliking MNP (AOR 1.90, 95% CI [1.13, 3.22]) were positively associated with recent intake. Interventions that increase caregiver knowledge and skills and focus on older children could improve MNP coverage and recent intake.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdultCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood, FortifiedHumansInfantInterviews as TopicMaleMicronutrientsPowdersProgram EvaluationUgandaMicronutrientsPowderschild nutritioncoveragehome fortificationimplementation sciencemicronutrient powders (MNP)Uganda

Identifiers

PMID31622041
PMCPMC7199021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.