Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31622039›Full record

ReviewMaternal & child nutrition2019

Designing an ethnographic interview for evaluation of micronutrient powder trial: Challenges and opportunities for implementation science.

Courtney H Schnefke, Alison Tumilowicz, Gretel H Pelto, Seifu Hagos Gebreyesus, Wendy Gonzalez, Mélanie Hrabar, Shanzeh Mahmood, Catia Pedro, Melanie Picolo, Edna Possolo and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Strengthening the Voices of Hispanic/Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Health Help-Seeking Behavior: The Scavengers' Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Courtney H SchnefkePublic Health Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0181-1502
Alison TumilowiczGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8955-1479
Gretel H PeltoDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-9271-8041
Seifu Hagos GebreyesusDepartment of Reproductive Health and Health Service Management, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Wendy GonzalezGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2682-0918
Mélanie HrabarIndependent Consultant, Cape Town, South Africa.
Shanzeh MahmoodGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.
Catia PedroGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.
Melanie PicoloMaternal and Child Survival Program/PATH, Maputo, Mozambique.
Edna PossoloDepartment of Nutrition, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Oana A ScarlatescuGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.
Dessie TarltonGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.
Julia VettersandIndependent Consultant, Maputo, Mozambique.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evidence base for micronutrient powder (MNP) interventions predominantly consists of quantitative studies focused on measuring coverage, utilization, and/or biological outcomes. We need other types of studies to broaden the scope of our knowledge about determinants of MNP programme effectiveness. Addressing this knowledge gap, this paper focuses on the process of designing an ethnographic research protocol to obtain caregivers' perspectives on the factors that influenced their use of intervention delivery services and their adherence to MNP recommendations. The research was undertaken within the context of formative evaluations conducted in Mozambique and Ethiopia. Ethnography provides a means for acquiring and interpreting this knowledge and is an approach particularly well suited for formative evaluation to understand the response of a population to new interventions and programme delivery processes. We describe decisions made and challenges encountered in developing the protocol, and their implications for advancing methodology in implementation research science. In addition to a core team of three investigators, we added an "advisory group" of 10 experts to advise us as we developed the protocol. The advisory group reviewed multiple drafts of the interview protocol and participated in mock interviews. In the protocol development process, we faced the issues and made decisions about concerned gaps in content, cultural adaptations and comprehension, and interview guide structure and format. Differences between the core team and the advisory group in methodological approaches to the structure and content of questions call attention to the importance of establishing greater communication among implementation scientists working in nutrition interventions.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedImplementation ScienceEthiopiaHumansMicronutrientsMozambiquePilot ProjectsPowdersProgram EvaluationMicronutrientsPowderscommunication challenges in multidisciplinary researchEthiopiafocused ethnographic researchformative evaluationimplementation science in nutritionmicronutrient powders

Identifiers

PMID31622039
PMCPMC6856841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.