Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31622038›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2019

Facility- and community-based delivery of micronutrient powders in Uganda: Opening the black box of implementation using mixed methods.

Alexis D'Agostino, Francis Ssebiryo, Hillary Murphy, Angelica Cristello, Rose Nakiwala, Katherine Otim, Danya Sarkar, Sarah Ngalombi, Whitney Schott, David Katuntu and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexis D'AgostinoStrengthening Partnerships, Results, and Innovation in Nutrition Globally (SPRING) project, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Rosslyn, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0104-4489
Francis SsebiryoSPRING project, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Kampala, Uganda.
Hillary MurphyStrengthening Partnerships, Results, and Innovation in Nutrition Globally (SPRING) project, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Rosslyn, Virginia, USA.
Angelica CristelloIndependent Consulant, Strengthening Partnerships, Results, and Innovation in Nutrition Globally (SPRING) project, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Rosslyn, Virginia, USA.
Rose NakiwalaSPRING project, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Kampala, Uganda.
Katherine OtimSPRING project, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Kampala, Uganda.
Danya SarkarStrengthening Partnerships, Results, and Innovation in Nutrition Globally (SPRING) project, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Rosslyn, Virginia, USA.
Sarah NgalombiNutrition Division, Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Whitney SchottPopulation Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
David KatuntuSPRING project, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Kampala, Uganda.
Marcia GriffithsSPRING project, The Manoff Group, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3845-9266
Sorrel M L NamasteDemographic Health Surveys Program, ICF, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Associates Research · UGCommunity Health Partnership · USICF International (United States) · USMinistry of Health · UGSpringer Nature (Germany) · DEUniversity City Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micronutrient powders (MNP) have the potential to increase micronutrient intake, yet documentation of implementation lessons remains a gap. This paper presents results of a pilot in Uganda comparing community- and facility-based delivery of MNP and documenting experiences of caregivers and distributors. The pilot's mixed method evaluation included a cross-sectional endline survey, monthly household visits, and midline and endline interviews. Primary outcomes were ever-covered (received ≥1 MNP packet), repeat-coverage (received ≥2 MNP packets), and adherence (consumed no more than 1 MNP sachet per day, consumed MNP with food, and consumed MNP 3+ days in past week). An adjusted Wald chi-square test compared differences in programme outcomes between arms, and logit regression identified predictors to adherence. Key informant interviews were coded thematically. Most programme outcomes in the endline survey were statistically significantly higher in the community arm, although in both arms, adherence was lower than other outcomes (adherence 31.4% in facility vs. 58.3% in community arm). Counselling, receipt of communication materials, perceived positive effects, MNP knowledge, and child liking MNP were consistent predictors of adherence in both arms. Qualitative findings corroborated survey results, revealing that social encouragement and advocacy facilitated use and that forgetting to give MNP was a barrier. Facility arm caregivers also cited distance, time, and transportation cost as barriers. Distributors had positive experiences with training and supervision but experienced increased workloads in both arms. MNP programme design is context-specific but could benefit from strengthened community sensitization, continued and more effective counselling for caregivers, and increased support for distributors.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImplementation ScienceInfantMaleMicronutrientsPilot ProjectsPowdersProgram EvaluationUgandaMicronutrientsPowdersanaemiadelivery channelsevidence-based practiceinfant and child nutritionmicronutrient powderssocial and behaviour change

Identifiers

PMID31622038
PMCPMC7199063
OpenAlexW2981313694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.