Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31622037›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2019

Mixed methods evaluation explains bypassing of vouchers in micronutrient powder trial in Mozambique.

Alison Tumilowicz, Marieke Vossenaar, Kirstine Kjaer, Julia Vettersand, Edna Possolo, Gretel H Pelto, Maria Elena Jefferds, Augusto Norte, Katia Dos Santos Dias, Nadia Osman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alison TumilowiczGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8955-1479
Marieke VossenaarIndependent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2101-2620
Kirstine KjaerIndependent Consultant, Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0003-0405-9416
Julia VettersandIndependent Consultant, Maputo, Mozambique.
Edna PossoloDepartment of Nutrition, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Gretel H PeltoDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-9271-8041
Maria Elena JefferdsDivision of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-4502
Augusto NorteA-Consultants Statistical Services, Mendoza, Argentina.
Katia Dos Santos DiasGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.
Nadia OsmanGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.
Wendy GonzalezGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2682-0918
Alia PoonawalaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4288-8354
Lynnette M NeufeldGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2652-9108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micronutrient powders (MNP) are recommended by the World Health Organization as an effective intervention to address anaemia in children. A formative process evaluation was conducted to assess the viability of a model using free vouchers in two districts of Mozambique to deliver MNP and motivate adherence to recommendations regarding its use. The evaluation consisted of (a) an examination of programme outcomes using a cross-sectional survey among caregivers of children 6-23 months (n = 1,028) and (b) an ethnographic study to investigate delivery experiences and MNP use from caregiver perspectives (n = 59), programme managers (n = 17), and programme implementers (n = 168). Using a mixed methods approach allowed exploration of unexpected programme outcomes and triangulation of findings. The survey revealed that receiving a voucher was the main implementation bottleneck. Although few caregivers received vouchers (11.5%, CI [9.7, 13.6]), one-fourth received MNP by bypassing the voucher system (26.3%, CI [23.6, 29.0]). Caregivers' narratives indicated that caregivers were motivated to redeem vouchers but encountered obstacles, including not knowing where or how to redeem them or finding MNP were not available at the shop. Observing these challenges, many programme implementers redeemed vouchers and distributed MNP to caregivers. Virtually, all caregivers who received MNP reported ever feeding it to their child. This study's findings are consistent with other studies across a range of contexts suggesting that although programmes are generally effective in motivating initial use, more attention is required to improve access to MNP and support continued use.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdolescentAdultCaregiversChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFood, FortifiedHumansInfantMaleMicronutrientsMothersMotivationMicronutrientsPowdersethnographyevaluationinfants and young nutritionmicronutrientsmixed methodsMozambique

Identifiers

PMID31622037
PMCPMC6856962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.