Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31621920›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

A sparse orthogonal collimator for small animal intensity-modulated radiation therapy part I: Planning system development and commissioning.

Kaley Woods, Dan Nguyen, Ryan Neph, Dan Ruan, Daniel O'Connor, Ke Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Small Animal IMRT Using 3D-Printed Compensators.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaley WoodsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Dan NguyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Ryan NephDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Dan RuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Daniel O'ConnorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Ke ShengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

Funding

UCLA Center for Biological RadioprotectorsU19AI067769 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHUTE, JOHN P, MCBRIDE, WILLIAM H. · 2005 to 2019
$44.6M
Development of intensity modulated radiation therapy for small animal researchR21CA228160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHENG, KE · 2018 to 2019
$367k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA228160NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067769NIH HHS R21CA228160NIH HHS U19AI067769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo achieve more translatable preclinical research results, small animal irradiation needs to more closely simulate human radiotherapy. Although the clinical gold standard is intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the direct translation of this method for small animals is impractical. In this study we describe the treatment planning system for a novel dose modulation device to address this challenge.

methodsUsing delineated target and avoidance structures, a rectangular aperture optimization (RAO) problem was formulated to penalize deviations from a desired dose distribution and limit the number of selected rectangular apertures. RAO was used to create IMRT plans with highly concave targets in the mouse brain, and the plan quality was compared to that using a hypothetical miniaturized multileaf collimator (MLC). RAO plans were also created for a realistic application of mouse whole liver irradiation and for a highly complex two-dimensional (2D) dose distribution as a proof-of-principle. Beam commissioning data, including output and off-axis factors and percent depth dose (PDD) curves, were acquired for our small animal irradiation system and incorporated into the treatment planning system. A plan post-processing step was implemented for aperture size-specific dose recalculation and aperture weighting reoptimization.

resultsThe first RAO test case achieved highly conformal doses to concave targets in the brain, with substantially better dose gradient, conformity, and target dose homogeneity than the hypothetical miniaturized MLC plans. In the second test case, a highly conformal dose to the liver was achieved with significant sparing of the kidneys. RAO also successfully replicated a complex 2D dose distribution with three prescription dose levels. Energy spectra for field sizes 1 to 20 mm were calculated to match the measured PDD curves, with maximum and mean dose deviations of 4.47 ± 0.30% and 1.71 ± 0.18%. The final reoptimization of aperture weightings for the complex RAO test plan was able to reduce the maximum and mean dose deviations between the optimized and recalculated dose distributions from 10.3% to 6.6% and 4.0% to 2.8%, respectively.

conclusionsUsing the advanced optimization techniques, complex IMRT plans were achieved using a simple dose modulation device. Beam commissioning data were incorporated into the treatment planning process to more accurately predict the resulting dose distribution. This platform substantially reduces the gap in treatment plan quality between clinical and preclinical radiotherapy, potentially increasing the value and flexibility of small animal studies.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAnimalsBrainMiceRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedcollimatordirect aperture optimizationintensity-modulated radiation therapypreclinical researchsmall animal radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31621920
PMCPMC6899210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.