Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31621582›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

ASPEN, a methodology for reconstructing protein evolution with improved accuracy using ensemble models.

Roman Sloutsky, Kristen M Naegle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roman SloutskyProgram in Computational and Systems Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0794-1255
Kristen M NaegleDepartment for Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7146-9592

Funding

HIGH PERFORMANCE BIOMEDICAL IMAGING COMPUTER RESOURCESS10RR022984 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2009 to 2009
$1.9M
GPU COMPUTING RESOURCE TO ENABLE INNOVATION IN IMAGING AND NETWORK BIOLOGYS10OD018091 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PAPPU, ROHIT V, PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2014 to 2014
$598k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR022984NIH HHS S10 OD018091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary reconstruction algorithms produce models of the evolutionary history of proteins or species. Such algorithms are highly sensitive to their inputs: the sequences used and their alignments. Here, we asked whether the variance introduced by selecting different input sequences could be used to better identify accurate evolutionary models. We subsampled from available ortholog sequences and measured the distribution of observed relationships between paralogs produced across hundreds of models inferred from the subsamples. We observed two important phenomena. First, the reproducibility of an all-sequence, single-alignment reconstruction, measured by comparing topologies inferred from 90% subsamples, directly correlates with the accuracy of that single-alignment reconstruction, producing a measurable value for something that has been traditionally unknowable. Second, topologies that are most consistent with the observations made in the ensemble are more accurate and we present a meta algorithm that exploits this property to improve model accuracy.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularComputational BiologyPlant ProteinsPlantsPlant Proteinscomputational biologydomainsensemblesevolutionary biologyhomologyhumanproteinsystems biologytrees

Identifiers

PMID31621582
PMCPMC6797483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.