Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31621208›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2019

The volume of

Shan-Bing Wang, Jia-Pei Liu, Kai-Jian Lei, Yu-Ming Jia, Yan Xu, Jin-Feng Rong, Chun-Xiu Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. The volume ofCancer medicine · 2019
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Role ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shan-Bing WangDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin City, Yibin, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5897-6829
Jia-Pei LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin City, Yibin, Sichuan, China.
Kai-Jian LeiDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin City, Yibin, Sichuan, China.
Yu-Ming JiaDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin City, Yibin, Sichuan, China.
Yan XuDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin City, Yibin, Sichuan, China.
Jin-Feng RongDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin City, Yibin, Sichuan, China.
Chun-Xiu WangDepartment of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Yibin City, Yibin, Sichuan, China.
Second People’s Hospital of Yibin · CN

Funding

Sichuan Medical Association Youth Innovation Project Q16082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether radiation dose-volume metrics to technetium-99m ( METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-nine patients with stage IB2-III cervical cancer who underwent

resultsThe mean ABM-V40 (23.22% ± 7.65%) and ABM-V30 (45.28% ± 9.20%) were significantly lower than the mean TBM-V40 (33.06% ± 6.72%) and TBM-V30 (53.08% ± 7.77%), respectively (t = 5.78, P = .001) (t = 4.13, P = .001). The ABM volume (<387.5 cm

conclusionsThe ABM volume (<387.5 cm

Indexed as

Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAdolescentAdultAgedBone MarrowChemoradiotherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHematologic DiseasesHematopoiesisHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedTechnetiumactive bone marrowcervical cancerhematologic toxicitySPET

Identifiers

PMID31621208
PMCPMC6885884
OpenAlexW2980837852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.