Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31621109›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2020

Cell-type-specific visualisation and biochemical isolation of endogenous synaptic proteins in mice.

Fei Zhu, Mark O Collins, Johan Harmse, Jyoti S Choudhary, Seth G N Grant, Noboru H Komiyama

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Understanding the molecular diversity of synapses.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fei ZhuCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Mark O CollinsDepartment of Biomedical Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7656-4975
Johan HarmseThe Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9917-9885
Jyoti S ChoudharyFunctional Proteomics Group, Chester Beatty Laboratories, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0881-5477
Seth G N GrantCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8732-8735
Noboru H KomiyamaCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9960-3597
University of Edinburgh · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Simons Foundation R83730Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust R44459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the remarkable molecular complexity of synapses has been revealed, with over 1,000 proteins identified in the synapse proteome. Although it is known that different receptors and other synaptic proteins are present in different types of neurons, the extent of synapse diversity across the brain is largely unknown. This is mainly due to the limitations of current techniques. Here, we report an efficient method for the purification of synaptic protein complexes, fusing a high-affinity tag to endogenous PSD95 in specific cell types. We also developed a strategy, which enables the visualisation of endogenous PSD95 with fluorescent-protein tag in Cre-recombinase-expressing cells. We demonstrate the feasibility of proteomic analysis of synaptic protein complexes and visualisation of these in specific cell types. We find that the composition of PSD95 complexes purified from specific cell types differs from those extracted from tissues with diverse cellular composition. The results suggest that there might be differential interactions in the PSD95 complexes in different brain regions. We have detected differentially interacting proteins by comparing data sets from the whole hippocampus and the CA3 subfield of the hippocampus. Therefore, these novel conditional PSD95 tagging lines will not only serve as powerful tools for precisely dissecting synapse diversity in specific brain regions and subsets of neuronal cells, but also provide an opportunity to better understand brain region- and cell-type-specific alterations associated with various psychiatric/neurological diseases. These newly developed conditional gene tagging methods can be applied to many different synaptic proteins and will facilitate research on the molecular complexity of synapses.

Indexed as

ProteomicsSynapsesAnimalsDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinHippocampusMiceNeuronsProteomeDisks Large Homolog 4 ProteinProteomeconditional taggingfluorescent proteinmouse geneticsproteomicsPSD

Identifiers

PMID31621109
PMCPMC7079123
OpenAlexW2980650059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.