Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31621091›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

A sparse orthogonal collimator for small animal intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Part II: hardware development and commissioning.

Kaley Woods, Ryan Neph, Dan Nguyen, Ke Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Small Animal IMRT Using 3D-Printed Compensators.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kaley WoodsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ryan NephDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Dan NguyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ke ShengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

UCLA Center for Biological RadioprotectorsU19AI067769 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHUTE, JOHN P, MCBRIDE, WILLIAM H. · 2005 to 2019
$44.6M
Development of intensity modulated radiation therapy for small animal researchR21CA228160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHENG, KE · 2018 to 2019
$367k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA228160NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067769NIH HHS R21CA228160NIH HHS U19AI067769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA dose-modulation device for small animal radiotherapy is required to use clinically analogous treatment techniques, which will likely increase the translatability of preclinical research results. Because the clinically used multileaf collimator (MLC) is impractical for miniaturization, we have developed a simpler, better-suited sparse orthogonal collimator (SOC) for delivering small animal intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a rectangular aperture optimization (RAO) treatment planning system.

methodsThe SOC system was modeled in computer-aided design software and fabricated with machined tungsten leaves and three-dimensional (3D) printed leaf housing. A graphical user interface was developed for controlling and calibrating the SOC leaves, which are driven by Arduino-controlled stepper motors. A Winston-Lutz test was performed to assess mechanical alignment, and abutting field and grid dose patterns were created to analyze intra- and intercalibration leaf positioning error. Leaf transmission and penumbra were measured over the full range of gantry angles and leaf positions, respectively. Three SOC test plans were delivered, and film measurements were compared to the intended dose distributions. The differences in maximum, mean, and minimum, as well as pixelwise absolute dose differences, were compared for each structure, and a gamma analysis was performed for the target structures using criteria of 4% dose difference and 0.3 mm distance to agreement.

resultsThe Winston-Lutz test revealed maximum directional offsets between the SOC and primary collimator axes of 0.53 mm at 0° and 0.68 mm over the full 360°. Upper and lower abutting field patterns had maximum dose deviations of 18.8 ± 3.1% and 15.5 ± 2.9%, respectively, and grid patterns showed intra- and intercalibration repeatability of 93% and 91%, respectively. Extremely low midleaf (0.15 ± 0.05%) and interleaf (0.27 ± 0.22%) transmission was measured, with no significant rotational variation. The average penumbra was ~0.8 mm for all leaves at field center, with a range of 0.17 mm for all leaf positions. A highly concave test plan was delivered with a ~ 95% gamma analysis pass rate, and a realistic mouse phantom liver irradiation plan achieved a pass rate of ~98%. A highly complex dose distribution was also created with 551 SOC apertures averaging 2.4 mm in size.

conclusionsA sparse orthogonal collimator was developed and commissioned, with promising preliminary dosimetry results. The SOC design, with its limited moving components and high dose-modulation resolution, is ideal for delivering high-quality small animal IMRT with our RAO-based treatment planning system.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignAnimalsMicePhantoms, ImagingRadiometryRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulatedcollimatordirect aperture optimizationintensity-modulated radiation therapypreclinical researchsmall animal radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31621091
PMCPMC8030274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.